qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] s390x/kvm: call cpu_synchronize_state() on


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] s390x/kvm: call cpu_synchronize_state() on every kvm_arch_handle_exit()
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 10:19:24 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0

On 05.04.2018 09:53, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/26/2018 11:20 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Manually having to use cpu_synchronize_state() is error prone. I don't
>> think that the performance impact is that huge if we simply synchronize
>> the state on every kvm_arch_handle_exit() call. This makes the code
>> easier to maintain.
>>
>> We now also call it (although not neded) for
>> - KVM_EXIT_S390_RESET -> s390_reipl_request()
>> - KVM_EXIT_DEBUG -> kvm_arch_handle_debug_exit()
>> - unmanagable/unimplemented intercepts
>> - ICPT_WAITPSW -> s390_handle_wait() -> cpu gets halted
>> - ICPT_CPU_STOP -> do_stop_interrupt() -> cpu gets halted
>> - Scenarios where we inject an operation exception
>> - handle_sigp() on the source CPU
>> - handle_stsi()
>>
>> I don't think any of these are performance critical. Especially as we
>> have all information directly contained in kvm_run, there are no
>> additional IOCTLs to issue on modern kernels.
> 
> We had other issues in the past in other (common code) places. For example
> see
> 
> commit 79ca7a1b898eb97c4192f3c78027a0f20485e7b4
> Author:     Christian Borntraeger <address@hidden>
> AuthorDate: Tue Mar 7 15:19:08 2017 +0100
> Commit:     Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> CommitDate: Tue Mar 14 13:26:36 2017 +0100
> 
>     exec: add cpu_synchronize_state to cpu_memory_rw_debug
> 
> so we might consider going even further.....But this will be tricky.
> 
> 
> FWIW, I think your patch even fixes a bug:
> 
> --- snip ----
> static int handle_diag(S390CPU *cpu, struct kvm_run *run, uint32_t ipb)
> {
>     int r = 0;
>     uint16_t func_code;
> 
>     /*
>      * For any diagnose call we support, bits 48-63 of the resulting
>      * address specify the function code; the remainder is ignored.
>      */
>     func_code = decode_basedisp_rs(&cpu->env, ipb, NULL) & DIAG_KVM_CODE_MASK;
> 
> ---->
>       static inline hwaddr decode_basedisp_s(CPUS390XState *env, uint32_t ipb,
>                                              uint8_t *ar)
>       {
>           hwaddr addr = 0;
>           uint8_t reg;
>           
>           reg = ipb >> 28;
>           if (reg > 0) {
>               addr = env->regs[reg];
> 
> ----> we do the sync_regs after this in the diag handler!
> So currently we only handle the case with base reg == 0 correctly.
> So
> diag x,y,0x500(0) 
> works
> 
> 
> but things like
> lghi 1,0x500
> diag x,y,0(1)
> 
> not unless I miss something.

FWIW: Sounds like a good idea for a new kvm-unit-test... any volunteers?

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]