[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] migration: move calling save_zero_page to t
From: |
Peter Xu |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] migration: move calling save_zero_page to the common place |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Mar 2018 20:49:31 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 03:57:37PM +0800, address@hidden wrote:
> From: Xiao Guangrong <address@hidden>
>
> save_zero_page() is always our first approach to try, move it to
> the common place before calling ram_save_compressed_page
> and ram_save_page
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <address@hidden>
> ---
> migration/ram.c | 106
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index 839665d866..9627ce18e9 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -1021,15 +1021,8 @@ static int ram_save_page(RAMState *rs,
> PageSearchStatus *pss, bool last_stage)
> trace_ram_save_page(block->idstr, (uint64_t)offset, p);
>
> XBZRLE_cache_lock();
> - pages = save_zero_page(rs, block, offset);
> - if (pages > 0) {
> - /* Must let xbzrle know, otherwise a previous (now 0'd) cached
> - * page would be stale
> - */
> - xbzrle_cache_zero_page(rs, current_addr);
> - ram_release_pages(block->idstr, offset, pages);
> - } else if (!rs->ram_bulk_stage &&
> - !migration_in_postcopy() && migrate_use_xbzrle()) {
> + if (!rs->ram_bulk_stage && !migration_in_postcopy() &&
> + migrate_use_xbzrle()) {
Nit: indent problem?
[...]
> +static bool save_page_use_compression(RAMState *rs)
> +{
> + if (!migrate_use_compression()) {
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If xbzrle is on, stop using the data compression after first
> + * round of migration even if compression is enabled. In theory,
> + * xbzrle can do better than compression.
> + */
> + if (rs->ram_bulk_stage || !migrate_use_xbzrle()) {
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +
Nit: remove this line?
Otherwise I'd say I like this patch... :)
Better with the nit fixed:
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu