qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.12] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Fix secure-GIC NS I


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.12] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Fix secure-GIC NS ICC_PMR and ICC_RPR accesses
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:51:34 +0000

Ping for code review -- it would be nice to put this bugfix
into rc1.

thanks
-- PMM

On 15 March 2018 at 13:34, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> If the GIC has the security extension support enabled, then a
> non-secure access to ICC_PMR must take account of the non-secure
> view of interrupt priorities, where real priorities 0..0x7f
> are secure-only and not visible to the non-secure guest, and
> priorities 0x80..0xff are shown to the guest as if they were
> 0x00..0xff. We had the logic here wrong:
>  * on reads, the priority is in the secure range if bit 7
>    is clear, not if it is set
>  * on writes, we want to set bit 7, not mask everything else
>
> Our ICC_RPR read code had the same error as ICC_PMR.
>
> (Compare the GICv3 spec pseudocode functions ICC_RPR_EL1
> and ICC_PMR_EL1.)
>
> Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1748434
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
> index 5cbafaf497..26f5eeda94 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
> @@ -836,7 +836,7 @@ static uint64_t icc_pmr_read(CPUARMState *env, const 
> ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>          /* NS access and Group 0 is inaccessible to NS: return the
>           * NS view of the current priority
>           */
> -        if (value & 0x80) {
> +        if ((value & 0x80) == 0) {
>              /* Secure priorities not visible to NS */
>              value = 0;
>          } else if (value != 0xff) {
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static void icc_pmr_write(CPUARMState *env, const 
> ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
>              /* Current PMR in the secure range, don't allow NS to change it 
> */
>              return;
>          }
> -        value = (value >> 1) & 0x80;
> +        value = (value >> 1) | 0x80;
>      }
>      cs->icc_pmr_el1 = value;
>      gicv3_cpuif_update(cs);
> @@ -1609,7 +1609,7 @@ static uint64_t icc_rpr_read(CPUARMState *env, const 
> ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>      if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3) &&
>          !arm_is_secure(env) && (env->cp15.scr_el3 & SCR_FIQ)) {
>          /* NS GIC access and Group 0 is inaccessible to NS */
> -        if (prio & 0x80) {
> +        if ((prio & 0x80) == 0) {
>              /* NS mustn't see priorities in the Secure half of the range */
>              prio = 0;
>          } else if (prio != 0xff) {
> --
> 2.16.2



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]