[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/25] RISC-V Post-merge spec conformance and cle
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/25] RISC-V Post-merge spec conformance and cleanup |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Mar 2018 12:09:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
On 21/03/2018 08:05, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 20.03.2018 23:25, Michael Clark wrote:
>> The following changes since commit f1a63fcfcd92c88be8942b5ae71aef9749a4f135:
>>
>> Update version for v2.12.0-rc0 release (2018-03-20 19:04:22 +0000)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>> https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu.git tags/riscv-qemu-2.12-fixes
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to e1a247183ac0816284dfda61423f7030b6686679:
>>
>> RISC-V: Remove erroneous comment from translate.c (2018-03-20 14:34:13
>> -0700)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This is a series of spec conformance bug fixes and code cleanups
>> that we would like to get in before the QEMU 2.12 release.
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> for future PULL request, could you please send out all patches again
> that should be pulled, and not send the cover letter alone? I.e. do a
> "git format-patch --subject-prefix PULL ..." and then replace the
> contents of the cover letter with the output of "git request-pull".
>
> ... this is how all other maintainers are sending PULL requests (at
> least as far as I know) and this way everybody gets a very final chance
> to have a look at the patches in their final state (it does not happen
> very often that someone replies to such patches, but in some rare cases
> we already found problems this way).
In fact, I already explained on the mailing list that this patch:
RISC-V: Hold rcu_read_lock when accessing memory
is fixing the wrong place, so please remove it from the pull request too.
Thanks,
Paolo