[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Deprecate tilegx ?
From: |
Chen Gang |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Deprecate tilegx ? |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:37:45 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
On 2/28/18 20:41, Bastian Koppelmann wrote:
> On 02/28/2018 07:11 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 27.02.2018 12:51, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>>> Possibly there are other target architectures we could reasonably
>>> deprecate-and-remove (though none of the other ones Linux is dropping
>>> in this round are ones we support)...
>>
>> I'd vote for marking tilegx as deprecated, too, since we even do not
>> have an active maintainer for that CPU core (at least I did not spot one
>> in our MAINTAINERS file). Opinions?
>
> I always saw it as a big plus that QEMU supports nearly any
> architecture, no matter how obscure it is. So I'm a bit more hesitant on
> dropping architectures quickly.
>
Firstly, sorry for too long time to no response about tilegx.
During latest 2 years, I turned to android development (custom aosp with
java/c++/c, merge android and linux together), and revert engineering
about android (java/c).
At present, sorry, I really have no time for tilegx any more. :(
For me, tilegx is still a good platform, and we have done much things,
now, so if we can find another maintainers/volunteers for it, I hope
qemu can still support tilegx.
By the way, for floating point instructions patches, I have sent before
(2 years ago), it seems I did not get any reply. I hope they are useful
for tilegx.
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang (陈刚)
Re: [Qemu-devel] Deprecate tilegx ?, Waldemar Brodkorb, 2018/03/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Deprecate tilegx ?,
Chen Gang <=