qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu] slirp/debug: Print IP addresses in human r


From: Alexey Kardashevskiy
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu] slirp/debug: Print IP addresses in human readable form
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 17:32:44 +1100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/59.0

On 7/3/18 5:24 pm, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 07.03.2018 04:38, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 01/02/18 20:35, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
>>
>> Ping?
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>>  slirp/arp_table.c | 4 ++--
>>>  slirp/socket.c    | 8 ++++----
>>>  slirp/udp.c       | 4 ++--
>>>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/slirp/arp_table.c b/slirp/arp_table.c
>>> index 3547043..bac608f 100644
>>> --- a/slirp/arp_table.c
>>> +++ b/slirp/arp_table.c
>>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ void arp_table_add(Slirp *slirp, uint32_t ip_addr, 
>>> uint8_t ethaddr[ETH_ALEN])
>>>      int i;
>>>  
>>>      DEBUG_CALL("arp_table_add");
>>> -    DEBUG_ARG("ip = 0x%x", ip_addr);
>>> +    DEBUG_ARG("ip = %s", inet_ntoa(*(struct in_addr *)&ip_addr));
> 
> Is this endianness safe? The man-page of inet_ntoa says that the
> function is expecting network byte order, so I wonder whether this works
> right on both, big and little endian hosts?



arp_table_add() is called for either sin_addr (network order) or
slirp_arphdr::ar_sip which is initialized from sin_addr (network order)
with no order conversion. Bugs are still possible, of course :)


-- 
Alexey



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]