Re: [Qemu-devel] [patches] Re: [PULL] RISC-V QEMU Port Submission

[Peter Maydell]

On 28 February 2018 at 11:53, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> With my 'upstream dev' hat on, I tend to be suspicious of this
> line of argument, because in a lot of cases what tends to happen
> is that the code for some new target or device goes in-tree, and
> then the people who worked on submitting it disappear, or never
> actually do get round to refactoring[*]. You get more leeway for
> making this argument the longer you've been around and participating
> in QEMU development, because then you have a track record of
> following up on things.

That said, I can probably live with it in this particular instance,
given when the 2.12 codefreeze deadline is.

thanks
-- PMM