[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Some question about savem/qcow2 incremental snapshot
From: |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Some question about savem/qcow2 incremental snapshot |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jan 2018 20:15:19 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) |
* Stefan Hajnoczi (address@hidden) wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> Certain guest operations like rebooting or zeroing memory will defeat
> >> the incremental guest RAM snapshot feature. It's worth thinking about
> >> these cases to make sure this feature would be worth it in real use
> >> cases.
> >
> > But those probably wouldn't upset an NVDimm?
>
> If the guest dirties all RAM then the incremental snapshot feature
> degrades to a full snapshot. I'm asking if there are common
> operations where that happens.
>
> I seem to remember Windows guests zero all pages on cold boot. Maybe
> that's not the case anymore.
>
> Worth checking before embarking on this feature because it could be a
> waste of effort if it turns out real-world guests dirty all memory in
> common cases.
Right, but I'm hoping that there's some magic somewhere where an NVDimm doesn't
get zero'd because of a cold boot since that would seem to make it
volatile.
Dave
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK