qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v17 1/6] lib/xbitmap: Introduce xbitmap


From: Tetsuo Handa
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v17 1/6] lib/xbitmap: Introduce xbitmap
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 19:55:43 +0900

I'm commenting without understanding the logic.

Wei Wang wrote:
> +
> +bool xb_preload(gfp_t gfp);
> +

Want __must_check annotation, for __radix_tree_preload() is marked
with __must_check annotation. By error failing to check result of
xb_preload() will lead to preemption kept disabled unexpectedly.



> +int xb_set_bit(struct xb *xb, unsigned long bit)
> +{
> +     int err;
> +     unsigned long index = bit / IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
> +     struct radix_tree_root *root = &xb->xbrt;
> +     struct radix_tree_node *node;
> +     void **slot;
> +     struct ida_bitmap *bitmap;
> +     unsigned long ebit;
> +
> +     bit %= IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
> +     ebit = bit + 2;
> +
> +     err = __radix_tree_create(root, index, 0, &node, &slot);
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +     bitmap = rcu_dereference_raw(*slot);
> +     if (radix_tree_exception(bitmap)) {
> +             unsigned long tmp = (unsigned long)bitmap;
> +
> +             if (ebit < BITS_PER_LONG) {
> +                     tmp |= 1UL << ebit;
> +                     rcu_assign_pointer(*slot, (void *)tmp);
> +                     return 0;
> +             }
> +             bitmap = this_cpu_xchg(ida_bitmap, NULL);
> +             if (!bitmap)

Please write locking rules, in order to explain how memory
allocated by __radix_tree_create() will not leak.

> +                     return -EAGAIN;
> +             memset(bitmap, 0, sizeof(*bitmap));
> +             bitmap->bitmap[0] = tmp >> RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_SHIFT;
> +             rcu_assign_pointer(*slot, bitmap);
> +     }
> +
> +     if (!bitmap) {
> +             if (ebit < BITS_PER_LONG) {
> +                     bitmap = (void *)((1UL << ebit) |
> +                                     RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_ENTRY);
> +                     __radix_tree_replace(root, node, slot, bitmap, NULL,
> +                                             NULL);
> +                     return 0;
> +             }
> +             bitmap = this_cpu_xchg(ida_bitmap, NULL);
> +             if (!bitmap)

Same here.

> +                     return -EAGAIN;
> +             memset(bitmap, 0, sizeof(*bitmap));
> +             __radix_tree_replace(root, node, slot, bitmap, NULL, NULL);
> +     }
> +
> +     __set_bit(bit, bitmap->bitmap);
> +     return 0;
> +}



> +void xb_clear_bit(struct xb *xb, unsigned long bit)
> +{
> +     unsigned long index = bit / IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
> +     struct radix_tree_root *root = &xb->xbrt;
> +     struct radix_tree_node *node;
> +     void **slot;
> +     struct ida_bitmap *bitmap;
> +     unsigned long ebit;
> +
> +     bit %= IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
> +     ebit = bit + 2;
> +
> +     bitmap = __radix_tree_lookup(root, index, &node, &slot);
> +     if (radix_tree_exception(bitmap)) {
> +             unsigned long tmp = (unsigned long)bitmap;
> +
> +             if (ebit >= BITS_PER_LONG)
> +                     return;
> +             tmp &= ~(1UL << ebit);
> +             if (tmp == RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_ENTRY)
> +                     __radix_tree_delete(root, node, slot);
> +             else
> +                     rcu_assign_pointer(*slot, (void *)tmp);
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (!bitmap)
> +             return;
> +
> +     __clear_bit(bit, bitmap->bitmap);
> +     if (bitmap_empty(bitmap->bitmap, IDA_BITMAP_BITS)) {

Please write locking rules, in order to explain how double kfree() and/or
use-after-free can be avoided.

> +             kfree(bitmap);
> +             __radix_tree_delete(root, node, slot);
> +     }
> +}



> +void xb_clear_bit_range(struct xb *xb, unsigned long start, unsigned long 
> end)
> +{
> +     struct radix_tree_root *root = &xb->xbrt;
> +     struct radix_tree_node *node;
> +     void **slot;
> +     struct ida_bitmap *bitmap;
> +     unsigned int nbits;
> +
> +     for (; start < end; start = (start | (IDA_BITMAP_BITS - 1)) + 1) {
> +             unsigned long index = start / IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
> +             unsigned long bit = start % IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
> +
> +             bitmap = __radix_tree_lookup(root, index, &node, &slot);
> +             if (radix_tree_exception(bitmap)) {
> +                     unsigned long ebit = bit + 2;
> +                     unsigned long tmp = (unsigned long)bitmap;
> +
> +                     nbits = min(end - start + 1, BITS_PER_LONG - ebit);
> +
> +                     if (ebit >= BITS_PER_LONG)
> +                             continue;
> +                     bitmap_clear(&tmp, ebit, nbits);
> +                     if (tmp == RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_ENTRY)
> +                             __radix_tree_delete(root, node, slot);
> +                     else
> +                             rcu_assign_pointer(*slot, (void *)tmp);
> +             } else if (bitmap) {
> +                     nbits = min(end - start + 1, IDA_BITMAP_BITS - bit);
> +
> +                     if (nbits != IDA_BITMAP_BITS)
> +                             bitmap_clear(bitmap->bitmap, bit, nbits);
> +
> +                     if (nbits == IDA_BITMAP_BITS ||
> +                             bitmap_empty(bitmap->bitmap, IDA_BITMAP_BITS)) {

Same here.

> +                             kfree(bitmap);
> +                             __radix_tree_delete(root, node, slot);
> +                     }
> +             }
> +     }
> +}



> +bool xb_test_bit(struct xb *xb, unsigned long bit)
> +{
> +     unsigned long index = bit / IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
> +     const struct radix_tree_root *root = &xb->xbrt;
> +     struct ida_bitmap *bitmap = radix_tree_lookup(root, index);
> +
> +     bit %= IDA_BITMAP_BITS;
> +
> +     if (!bitmap)
> +             return false;
> +     if (radix_tree_exception(bitmap)) {
> +             bit += RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_SHIFT;
> +             if (bit > BITS_PER_LONG)

Why not bit >= BITS_PER_LONG here?

> +                     return false;
> +             return (unsigned long)bitmap & (1UL << bit);
> +     }
> +
> +     return test_bit(bit, bitmap->bitmap);
> +}



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]