[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] io: Fix QIOChannelFile when creating and openin
From: |
Marc-André Lureau |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] io: Fix QIOChannelFile when creating and opening read-write |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:49:01 +0100 |
Hi
(adding the maintainer in cc, scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f io/channel-file.c)
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Ross Lagerwall
<address@hidden> wrote:
> The code wrongly passes the mode to open() only if O_WRONLY is set.
> Instead, the mode should be passed when O_CREAT is set (or O_TMPFILE on
> Linux). Fix this by always passing the mode since open() will correctly
> ignore the mode if it is not needed. Add a testcase which exercises this
> bug.
ok
>
> While at it, add /dev/fdset/ support to QIOChannelFile by calling
> qemu_open() instead open(). There is a subtle semantic change since
> qemu_open() automatically sets O_CLOEXEC, but this doesn't affect any of
> the users of the function.
>
yes, I meant to send a similar patch. However, it should probably call
qemu_close() then.
> Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall <address@hidden>
> ---
> include/io/channel-file.h | 2 +-
> io/channel-file.c | 6 +-----
> tests/test-io-channel-file.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/io/channel-file.h b/include/io/channel-file.h
> index 79245f1..ebfe54e 100644
> --- a/include/io/channel-file.h
> +++ b/include/io/channel-file.h
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ qio_channel_file_new_fd(int fd);
> * qio_channel_file_new_path:
> * @path: the file path
> * @flags: the open flags (O_RDONLY|O_WRONLY|O_RDWR, etc)
> - * @mode: the file creation mode if O_WRONLY is set in @flags
> + * @mode: the file creation mode if O_CREAT is set in @flags
> * @errp: pointer to initialized error object
> *
> * Create a new IO channel object for a file represented
> diff --git a/io/channel-file.c b/io/channel-file.c
> index b383273..ae8fb62 100644
> --- a/io/channel-file.c
> +++ b/io/channel-file.c
> @@ -50,11 +50,7 @@ qio_channel_file_new_path(const char *path,
>
> ioc = QIO_CHANNEL_FILE(object_new(TYPE_QIO_CHANNEL_FILE));
>
> - if (flags & O_WRONLY) {
> - ioc->fd = open(path, flags, mode);
> - } else {
> - ioc->fd = open(path, flags);
> - }
> + ioc->fd = qemu_open(path, flags, mode);
> if (ioc->fd < 0) {
> object_unref(OBJECT(ioc));
> error_setg_errno(errp, errno,
> diff --git a/tests/test-io-channel-file.c b/tests/test-io-channel-file.c
> index 6bfede6..0c7303d 100644
> --- a/tests/test-io-channel-file.c
> +++ b/tests/test-io-channel-file.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,32 @@ static void test_io_channel_file(void)
> object_unref(OBJECT(dst));
> }
>
> +static void test_io_channel_file_rdwr(void)
> +{
> + QIOChannel *src, *dst;
> + QIOChannelTest *test;
> +
> +#define TEST_FILE "tests/test-io-channel-file.txt"
> + unlink(TEST_FILE);
> + src = QIO_CHANNEL(qio_channel_file_new_path(
> + TEST_FILE,
> + O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_BINARY, 0600,
> + &error_abort));
> + dst = QIO_CHANNEL(qio_channel_file_new_path(
> + TEST_FILE,
> + O_RDONLY | O_BINARY, 0,
> + &error_abort));
> +
> + test = qio_channel_test_new();
> + qio_channel_test_run_writer(test, src);
> + qio_channel_test_run_reader(test, dst);
> + qio_channel_test_validate(test);
> +
> + unlink(TEST_FILE);
> + object_unref(OBJECT(src));
> + object_unref(OBJECT(dst));
> +}
> +
>
> static void test_io_channel_fd(void)
> {
> @@ -114,6 +140,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
>
> g_test_add_func("/io/channel/file", test_io_channel_file);
> + g_test_add_func("/io/channel/file/rdwr", test_io_channel_file_rdwr);
> g_test_add_func("/io/channel/file/fd", test_io_channel_fd);
> #ifndef _WIN32
> g_test_add_func("/io/channel/pipe/sync", test_io_channel_pipe_sync);
> --
> 2.9.5
>
>
Looks good to me otherwise.
--
Marc-André Lureau