qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] s390x/css: fix css migration compat handlin


From: Cornelia Huck
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] s390x/css: fix css migration compat handling
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 13:10:35 +0200

On Wed,  4 Oct 2017 13:01:09 +0200
Halil Pasic <address@hidden> wrote:

> Commit e996583eb3 ("s390x/css: activate ChannelSubSys migration",
> 2017-07-11) was supposed to enable css migration for virtio-ccw
> machines starting 2.10, but it ended up effectively enabling it
> only for 2.10 as the registration of the appropriate VMStateDescription
> happens in ccw_machine_2_10_instance_options which does not get
> called for machines more recent than 2_10.
> 
> Let us move the corresponding chunk of code (which conditionally enables
> the migration based on the value of the corresponding class property) to
> a ccw_init, which is called for each virtio-ccw machine instance.

s/a//

> 
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <address@hidden>
> Reported-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> index fafbc6d4fe..3b5dfdb48d 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
> @@ -313,6 +313,9 @@ static void ccw_init(MachineState *machine)
>          ret = css_create_css_image(VIRTUAL_CSSID, true);
>      }
>      assert(ret == 0);
> +    if (css_migration_enabled()) {
> +        css_register_vmstate();
> +    }
>  
>      /* Create VirtIO network adapters */
>      s390_create_virtio_net(BUS(css_bus), "virtio-net-ccw");
> @@ -731,9 +734,6 @@ DEFINE_CCW_MACHINE(2_11, "2.11", true);
>  static void ccw_machine_2_10_instance_options(MachineState *machine)
>  {
>      ccw_machine_2_11_instance_options(machine);
> -    if (css_migration_enabled()) {
> -        css_register_vmstate();
> -    }
>  }
>  
>  static void ccw_machine_2_10_class_options(MachineClass *mc)

Looks sane.

Out of curiosity: Which machine types did you test migration for?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]