qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/6] ppc: spapr: Handle "ibm, nmi-register" a


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 2/6] ppc: spapr: Handle "ibm, nmi-register" and "ibm, nmi-interlock" RTAS calls
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 16:49:29 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.0 (2017-09-02)

I don't suppose there's a way to stop your mailer from inserting
spaces after the commas in the subject line,


On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 04:07:48PM +0530, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
> This patch adds support in QEMU to handle "ibm,nmi-register"
> and "ibm,nmi-interlock" RTAS calls.
> 
> The machine check notification address is saved when the
> OS issues "ibm,nmi-register" RTAS call.
> 
> This patch also handles the case when multiple processors
> experience machine check at or about the same time by
> handling "ibm,nmi-interlock" call. In such cases, as per
> PAPR, subsequent processors serialize waiting for the first
> processor to issue the "ibm,nmi-interlock" call. The second
> processor waits till the first processor, which also
> received a machine check error, is done reading the error
> log. The first processor issues "ibm,nmi-interlock" call
> when the error log is consumed. This patch implements the
> releasing part of the error-log while subsequent patch
> (which builds error log) handles the locking part.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aravinda Prasad <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/ppc/spapr.c         |    8 ++++++++
>  hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c    |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/hw/ppc/spapr.h |   11 ++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 5deae30..d568ea6 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -1477,6 +1477,11 @@ static void ppc_spapr_reset(void)
>      first_ppc_cpu->env.nip = SPAPR_ENTRY_POINT;
>  
>      spapr->cas_reboot = false;
> +
> +    spapr->mc_status = -1;
> +    spapr->guest_machine_check_addr = 0;

You should probably use -1 as the default for this - strictly speaking
the guest could legitimately choose to have it's machine check
processing code at 0, though it would be a strange choice.

> +    qemu_cond_destroy(&spapr->mc_delivery_cond);
> +    qemu_cond_init(&spapr->mc_delivery_cond);

What will this do if one of the vcpus is waiting on the condition
variable right now?  I suspect you're going to need to first wake up
the queue, and marshal any blocked vcpus back into dead mode instead
of this.

>  }
>  
>  static void spapr_create_nvram(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
> @@ -2598,6 +2603,9 @@ static void ppc_spapr_init(MachineState *machine)
>  
>          kvmppc_spapr_enable_inkernel_multitce();
>      }
> +
> +    spapr->mc_status = -1;
> +    qemu_cond_init(&spapr->mc_delivery_cond);
>  }
>  
>  static int spapr_kvm_type(const char *vm_type)
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> index cdf0b60..08e9a5e 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> @@ -348,6 +348,37 @@ static void rtas_get_power_level(PowerPCCPU *cpu, 
> sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
>      rtas_st(rets, 1, 100);
>  }
>  
> +static void rtas_ibm_nmi_register(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> +                                  sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> +                                  uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
> +                                  target_ulong args,
> +                                  uint32_t nret, target_ulong rets)
> +{
> +    spapr->guest_machine_check_addr = rtas_ld(args, 1);
> +    rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
> +}
> +
> +static void rtas_ibm_nmi_interlock(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> +                                   sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> +                                   uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
> +                                   target_ulong args,
> +                                   uint32_t nret, target_ulong rets)
> +{
> +    if (!spapr->guest_machine_check_addr) {
> +        /* NMI register not called */
> +        rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR);
> +    } else {
> +        /*
> +         * VCPU issuing "ibm,nmi-interlock" is done with NMI handling,
> +         * hence unset mc_status.
> +         */
> +        spapr->mc_status = -1;
> +        qemu_cond_signal(&spapr->mc_delivery_cond);
> +        rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +
>  static struct rtas_call {
>      const char *name;
>      spapr_rtas_fn fn;
> @@ -489,6 +520,10 @@ static void core_rtas_register_types(void)
>                          rtas_set_power_level);
>      spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_GET_POWER_LEVEL, "get-power-level",
>                          rtas_get_power_level);
> +    spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_IBM_NMI_REGISTER, "ibm,nmi-register",
> +                        rtas_ibm_nmi_register);
> +    spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_IBM_NMI_INTERLOCK, "ibm,nmi-interlock",
> +                        rtas_ibm_nmi_interlock);
>  }
>  
>  type_init(core_rtas_register_types)
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> index b395aa7..28b6e2e 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> @@ -124,6 +124,13 @@ struct sPAPRMachineState {
>       * occurs during the unplug process. */
>      QTAILQ_HEAD(, sPAPRDIMMState) pending_dimm_unplugs;
>  
> +    /* State related to "ibm,nmi-register" and "ibm,nmi-interlock" calls */
> +    target_ulong guest_machine_check_addr;

You need to migrate this.  This is separate and simpler from the
problems of migrating during machine check handling - at the moment if
the guest calls nmi-register, then you migrate, then a machine check
is triggered you will have lost the information on how to handle it
properly.


> +    /* mc_status is set to -1 if mc is not in progress, else is set to the 
> CPU
> +     * handling the mc. */
> +    int mc_status;
> +    QemuCond mc_delivery_cond;
> +
>      /*< public >*/
>      char *kvm_type;
>      MemoryHotplugState hotplug_memory;
> @@ -520,8 +527,10 @@ target_ulong spapr_hypercall(PowerPCCPU *cpu, 
> target_ulong opcode,
>  #define RTAS_IBM_CREATE_PE_DMA_WINDOW           (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x27)
>  #define RTAS_IBM_REMOVE_PE_DMA_WINDOW           (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x28)
>  #define RTAS_IBM_RESET_PE_DMA_WINDOW            (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x29)
> +#define RTAS_IBM_NMI_REGISTER                   (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x2A)
> +#define RTAS_IBM_NMI_INTERLOCK                  (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x2B)
>  
> -#define RTAS_TOKEN_MAX                          (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x2A)
> +#define RTAS_TOKEN_MAX                          (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x2C)
>  
>  /* RTAS ibm,get-system-parameter token values */
>  #define RTAS_SYSPARM_SPLPAR_CHARACTERISTICS      20
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]