[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/15] char-io: fix possible race on IOWatchPoll
From: |
Peter Xu |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/15] char-io: fix possible race on IOWatchPoll |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:09:26 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:57:03AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 03:50:22PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > This is not a problem if we are only having one single loop thread like
> > before. However, after per-monitor thread is introduced, this is not
> > true any more, and the race can happen.
> >
> > The race can be triggered with "make check -j8" sometimes:
> >
> > qemu-system-x86_64: /root/git/qemu/chardev/char-io.c:91:
> > io_watch_poll_finalize: Assertion `iwp->src == NULL' failed.
> >
> > This patch keeps the reference for the watch object when creating in
> > io_add_watch_poll(), so that the object will never be released in the
> > context main loop, especially when the context loop is running in
> > another standalone thread. Meanwhile, when we want to remove the watch
> > object, we always first detach the watch object from its owner context,
> > then we continue with the cleanup.
> >
> > Without this patch, calling io_remove_watch_poll() in main loop thread
> > is not thread-safe, since the other per-monitor thread may be modifying
> > the watch object at the same time.
>
> This doesn't feel right to me. Why is the main loop thread doing anything
> at all with the Chardev, if there is a per-monitor thread ? The Chardev
> code isn't thread safe so it isn't safe to have two separate threads
> accessing the same Chardev. IOW, if we want a per-monitor thread, then
> we must make sure the main thread never touches that monitor's chardev
> at all. While your patch here might have avoided the assertion you
> mention above, I fear this is just papering over a fundamental problem
> that still exists, that can only be solved by not letting the mainloop
> touch the chardev at all.
The stack I encountered:
#0 0x00007f658234c765 in __GI_raise (address@hidden) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:54
#1 0x00007f658234e36a in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89
#2 0x00007f6582344f97 in __assert_fail_base (fmt=<optimized out>,
address@hidden "iwp->src == NULL", address@hidden
"/root/git/qemu/chardev/char-io.c", address@hidden, address@hidden
<__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.21863> "io_watch_poll_finalize") at assert.c:92
#3 0x00007f6582345042 in __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x55c76345fce1
"iwp->src == NULL", file=0x55c76345fcc0 "/root/git/qemu/chardev/char-io.c",
line=91, function=0x55c76345fd10 <__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.21863>
"io_watch_poll_finalize") at assert.c:101
#4 0x000055c7632c2be5 in io_watch_poll_finalize (source=0x55c7651cd450) at
/root/git/qemu/chardev/char-io.c:91
#5 0x00007f65847bb859 in g_source_unref_internal () at /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6 0x00007f65847bca29 in g_source_destroy_internal () at
/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#7 0x000055c7632c2d30 in io_remove_watch_poll (source=0x55c7651cd450) at
/root/git/qemu/chardev/char-io.c:139
#8 0x000055c7632c2d5c in remove_fd_in_watch (chr=0x55c7651ccdf0) at
/root/git/qemu/chardev/char-io.c:145
#9 0x000055c7632c2368 in qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers (b=0x55c7651f6410,
fd_can_read=0x0, fd_read=0x0, fd_event=0x0, be_change=0x0, opaque=0x0,
context=0x0, set_open=true)
at /root/git/qemu/chardev/char-fe.c:267
#10 0x000055c7632c2221 in qemu_chr_fe_deinit (b=0x55c7651f6410, del=false) at
/root/git/qemu/chardev/char-fe.c:231
#11 0x000055c762e2b15c in monitor_data_destroy (mon=0x55c7651f6410) at
/root/git/qemu/monitor.c:600
#12 0x000055c762e340ec in monitor_cleanup () at /root/git/qemu/monitor.c:4346
#13 0x000055c762f9445d in main (argc=19, argv=0x7ffc6846d0e8,
envp=0x7ffc6846d188) at /root/git/qemu/vl.c:4889
So it's destroying the CharBackend, but it'll then call
qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers() which finally tries to remove the watch poll.
If without current patch, I can still encounter the same crash when
doing "make check -j8".
>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <address@hidden>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
> > ---
> > chardev/char-io.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/chardev/char-io.c b/chardev/char-io.c
> > index f810524..3828c20 100644
> > --- a/chardev/char-io.c
> > +++ b/chardev/char-io.c
> > @@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ GSource *io_add_watch_poll(Chardev *chr,
> > g_free(name);
> >
> > g_source_attach(&iwp->parent, context);
> > - g_source_unref(&iwp->parent);
> > return (GSource *)iwp;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -131,12 +130,24 @@ static void io_remove_watch_poll(GSource *source)
> > IOWatchPoll *iwp;
> >
> > iwp = io_watch_poll_from_source(source);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Here the order of destruction really matters. We need to first
> > + * detach the IOWatchPoll object from the context (which may still
> > + * be running in another loop thread), only after that could we
> > + * continue to operate on iwp->src, or there may be race condition
> > + * between current thread and the context loop thread.
> > + *
> > + * Let's blame the glib bug mentioned in commit 2b3167 (again) for
> > + * this extra complexity.
> > + */
> > + g_source_destroy(&iwp->parent);
> > if (iwp->src) {
> > g_source_destroy(iwp->src);
> > g_source_unref(iwp->src);
> > iwp->src = NULL;
> > }
> > - g_source_destroy(&iwp->parent);
> > + g_source_unref(&iwp->parent);
> > }
> >
> > void remove_fd_in_watch(Chardev *chr)
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
Peter Xu
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC 00/15] QMP: out-of-band (OOB) execution support, Peter Xu, 2017/09/14
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/15] char-io: fix possible race on IOWatchPoll, Peter Xu, 2017/09/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/15] char-io: fix possible race on IOWatchPoll, Eric Blake, 2017/09/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/15] char-io: fix possible race on IOWatchPoll, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/09/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/15] char-io: fix possible race on IOWatchPoll,
Peter Xu <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/15] char-io: fix possible race on IOWatchPoll, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/09/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/15] char-io: fix possible race on IOWatchPoll, Peter Xu, 2017/09/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/15] char-io: fix possible race on IOWatchPoll, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/09/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/15] char-io: fix possible race on IOWatchPoll, Peter Xu, 2017/09/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/15] char-io: fix possible race on IOWatchPoll, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/09/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/15] char-io: fix possible race on IOWatchPoll, Peter Xu, 2017/09/20
[Qemu-devel] [RFC 02/15] qobject: allow NULL for qstring_get_str(), Peter Xu, 2017/09/14
[Qemu-devel] [RFC 03/15] qobject: introduce qobject_to_str(), Peter Xu, 2017/09/14