[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arm: Fix SMC reporting to EL2 when QEMU provide
From: |
Jan Kiszka |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arm: Fix SMC reporting to EL2 when QEMU provides PSCI |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:59:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
On 2017-09-18 09:51, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>
>
> This properly forwards SMC events to EL2 when PSCI is provided by QEMU
> itself and, thus, ARM_FEATURE_EL3 is off.
>
> Found and tested with the Jailhouse hypervisor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>
> ---
> target/arm/helper.c | 2 +-
> target/arm/op_helper.c | 8 ++++----
> target/arm/psci.c | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index 4f41841ef6..8c3929762c 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -3717,7 +3717,7 @@ static void hcr_write(CPUARMState *env, const
> ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t value)
>
> if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3)) {
> valid_mask &= ~HCR_HCD;
> - } else {
> + } else if (cpu->psci_conduit != QEMU_PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC) {
> valid_mask &= ~HCR_TSC;
> }
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/op_helper.c b/target/arm/op_helper.c
> index 6a60464ab9..4b0ef6a234 100644
> --- a/target/arm/op_helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/op_helper.c
> @@ -960,12 +960,12 @@ void HELPER(pre_smc)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t
> syndrome)
> return;
> }
>
> - if (!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3)) {
> - /* If we have no EL3 then SMC always UNDEFs */
> - undef = true;
> - } else if (!secure && cur_el == 1 && (env->cp15.hcr_el2 & HCR_TSC)) {
> + if (!secure && cur_el == 1 && (env->cp15.hcr_el2 & HCR_TSC)) {
> /* In NS EL1, HCR controlled routing to EL2 has priority over SMD. */
> raise_exception(env, EXCP_HYP_TRAP, syndrome, 2);
> + } else if (!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3)) {
> + /* If we have no EL3 then SMC always UNDEFs */
> + undef = true;
> }
>
> if (undef) {
> diff --git a/target/arm/psci.c b/target/arm/psci.c
> index fc34b263d3..637987ff46 100644
> --- a/target/arm/psci.c
> +++ b/target/arm/psci.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ bool arm_is_psci_call(ARMCPU *cpu, int excp_type)
> */
> CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
> uint64_t param = is_a64(env) ? env->xregs[0] : env->regs[0];
> + int cur_el = arm_current_el(env);
> + bool secure = arm_is_secure(env);
>
> switch (excp_type) {
> case EXCP_HVC:
> @@ -46,6 +48,10 @@ bool arm_is_psci_call(ARMCPU *cpu, int excp_type)
> if (cpu->psci_conduit != QEMU_PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC) {
> return false;
> }
> + if (!secure && cur_el == 1 && (env->cp15.hcr_el2 & HCR_TSC)) {
> + /* The EL2 will handle this. */
> + return false;
> + }
> break;
> default:
> return false;
>
FWIW, we've now a stable (and fast!) QEMU setup running Jailhouse for
aarch64. We just got bitten by a deficit that this setup revealed in our
device tree overlay. See also
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jailhouse-dev/ZqWpFyMXtZE
Looking forward to eventually expand this to ARMv7, GICv2, or ITS.
Anyone working on those edges already or plan to do so?
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux