qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tests: Make acpid test compile


From: Daniel P. Berrange
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tests: Make acpid test compile
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:07:43 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:51:23PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Cedric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On 08/23/2017 01:53 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >> * Juan Quintela (address@hidden) wrote:
> >>> Compiler gets confused with the size of the struct, so move form
> >>> g_new0() to g_malloc0().
> >>>
> >>> I *think* that the problem is in gcc (or glib for that matter), but
> >>> the documentation of the g_new0 states that 1sts first argument is an
> >>> struct type, and uint32_t is not an struct type.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <address@hidden>
> >>> ---
> >>>  tests/vmgenid-test.c | 2 +-
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/tests/vmgenid-test.c b/tests/vmgenid-test.c
> >>> index 3d5c1c3615..032e1d465a 100644
> >>> --- a/tests/vmgenid-test.c
> >>> +++ b/tests/vmgenid-test.c
> >>> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void)
> >>>      g_assert_cmpint(tables_nr, >, 0);
> >>>  
> >>>      /* get the addresses of the tables pointed by rsdt */
> >>> -    tables = g_new0(uint32_t, tables_nr);
> >>> +    tables = g_malloc0(sizeof(uint32_t) * tables_nr);
> >> 
> >> I think there's an easier fix for this I think;
> >> try:
> >> 
> >> -    g_assert_cmpint(tables_nr, >, 0);
> >> +    g_assert(tables_nr > 0);
> 
> I liked more the following one.
> 
> 
> >
> > I fixed that one with :
> >
> > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static uint32_t acpi_find_vgia(void)
> >      AcpiRsdpDescriptor rsdp_table;
> >      uint32_t rsdt;
> >      AcpiRsdtDescriptorRev1 rsdt_table;
> > -    int tables_nr;
> > +    uint32_t tables_nr;
> >      uint32_t *tables;
> >      AcpiTableHeader ssdt_table;
> >      VgidTable vgid_table;
> 
> 
> This make things work for me, so moving to this one.

It should be size_t, because its taking the result of a calculation that
is size_t.  You also need to change the assert I mention in my other email.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]