qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 12/17] migration: Send the fd number which we


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 12/17] migration: Send the fd number which we are going to use for this page
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 18:48:35 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1

On 17/07/2017 15:42, Juan Quintela wrote:
> We are still sending the page through the main channel, that would
> change later in the series
> 
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <address@hidden>
> ---
>  migration/ram.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index 90e1bcb..ac0742f 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ static int multifd_send_page(uint8_t *address)
>      qemu_mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
>      qemu_sem_post(&p->sem);
>  
> -    return 0;
> +    return i;
>  }
>  
>  struct MultiFDRecvParams {
> @@ -1143,6 +1143,7 @@ static int ram_multifd_page(RAMState *rs, 
> PageSearchStatus *pss,
>                              bool last_stage)
>  {
>      int pages;
> +    uint16_t fd_num;
>      uint8_t *p;
>      RAMBlock *block = pss->block;
>      ram_addr_t offset = pss->page << TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
> @@ -1154,8 +1155,10 @@ static int ram_multifd_page(RAMState *rs, 
> PageSearchStatus *pss,
>          ram_counters.transferred +=
>              save_page_header(rs, rs->f, block,
>                               offset | RAM_SAVE_FLAG_MULTIFD_PAGE);
> +        fd_num = multifd_send_page(p);
> +        qemu_put_be16(rs->f, fd_num);
> +        ram_counters.transferred += 2; /* size of fd_num */
>          qemu_put_buffer(rs->f, p, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE);
> -        multifd_send_page(p);
>          ram_counters.transferred += TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
>          pages = 1;
>          ram_counters.normal++;
> @@ -2905,6 +2908,7 @@ static int ram_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int 
> version_id)
>      while (!postcopy_running && !ret && !(flags & RAM_SAVE_FLAG_EOS)) {
>          ram_addr_t addr, total_ram_bytes;
>          void *host = NULL;
> +        uint16_t fd_num;
>          uint8_t ch;
>  
>          addr = qemu_get_be64(f);
> @@ -3015,6 +3019,11 @@ static int ram_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int 
> version_id)
>              break;
>  
>          case RAM_SAVE_FLAG_MULTIFD_PAGE:
> +            fd_num = qemu_get_be16(f);
> +            if (fd_num != 0) {
> +                /* this is yet an unused variable, changed later */
> +                fd_num = fd_num;
> +            }
>              qemu_get_buffer(f, host, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE);
>              break;
>  
> 


I'm still not convinced of doing this instead of just treating all
sockets equivalently (and flushing them all when the main socket is told
that there is a new block).

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]