[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Do we need a "virt-2.10" machine type before the 2.10 r
From: |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Do we need a "virt-2.10" machine type before the 2.10 release? |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Aug 2017 18:48:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) |
* Peter Maydell (address@hidden) wrote:
> Hi; I noticed today that the virt board doesn't have a virt-2.10
> machine type defined. Do we need to add it before release?
>
> (I don't know if there have in fact been any changes between
> 2.9 and 2.10 that would be compatibility issues.)
I think there's two sub questions:
a) The virt-2.9 needs to pick up HW_COMPAT_2_9 if anything
in it is relevant for ARM
b) If anything is relevant in it for ARM then you probably
want a virt-2.10 so that you can take advantage of whatever
was changed that needed compatibility adding in HW_COMPAT_2_9
(The other thing is figuring out what we missed in HW_COMPAT_2_9,
we normally miss something).
Dave
> thanks
> -- PMM
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK