[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 02/04] colo-compare: Processpactkets in the I
From: |
wang.yong155 |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 02/04] colo-compare: Processpactkets in the IOThreadofthe primary |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jul 2017 09:02:59 +0800 (CST) |
>On 24/07/2017 12:38, address@hidden wrote:
>> finally use g_main_loop_run to replace aio_poll in the
>> iothread_run function.
>
>That would make the performance of virtio-blk with iothreads worse,
>unfortunately. aio_poll is much more optimized than g_main_loop_run.
Hi Paolo,
Any other good idea to achieve this?
Thanks
>
>Paolo
>
>> After that IOThread
>> runs the GMainContext event loop,chardev and IOThread can work together.
>>
>> How about it? If feasible, I will try to submit
原始邮件
发件人: <address@hidden>
收件人:王勇10170530 <address@hidden> <address@hidden> <address@hidden>
抄送人: <address@hidden> <address@hidden> <address@hidden>
<address@hidden>王广10165992
日 期 :2017年07月24日 19:59
主 题 :Re: [PATCHv2 02/04] colo-compare: Processpactkets in the IOThreadofthe
primary
On 24/07/2017 12:38, address@hidden wrote:
> finally use g_main_loop_run to replace aio_poll in the
> iothread_run function.
That would make the performance of virtio-blk with iothreads worse,
unfortunately. aio_poll is much more optimized than g_main_loop_run.
Paolo
> After that IOThread
> runs the GMainContext event loop,chardev and IOThread can work together.
>
> How about it? If feasible, I will try to submit a patch.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 02/04] colo-compare: Processpactkets in the IOThreadofthe primary,
wang.yong155 <=