[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [PULL 18/21] pseries: Use smaller default hash page tables
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [PULL 18/21] pseries: Use smaller default hash page tables when guest can resize |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:56:18 +1000 |
We've now implemented a PAPR extension allowing PAPR guest to resize
their hash page table (HPT) during runtime.
This patch makes use of that facility to allocate smaller HPTs by default.
Specifically when a guest is aware of the HPT resize facility, qemu sizes
the HPT to the initial memory size, rather than the maximum memory size on
the assumption that the guest will resize its HPT if necessary for hot
plugged memory.
When the initial memory size is much smaller than the maximum memory size
(a common configuration with e.g. oVirt / RHEV) then this can save
significant memory on the HPT.
If the guest does *not* advertise HPT resize awareness when it makes the
ibm,client-architecture-support call, qemu resizes the HPT for maxmimum
memory size (unless it's been configured not to allow such guests at all).
For now we make that reallocation assuming the guest has not yet used the
HPT at all. That's true in practice, but not, strictly, an architectural
or PAPR requirement. If we need to in future we can fix this by having
the client-architecture-support call reboot the guest with the revised
HPT size (the client-architecture-support call is explicitly permitted to
trigger a reboot in this way).
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <address@hidden>
---
hw/ppc/spapr.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 2 ++
include/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
index 3a925ef18a..68f936c4f8 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
@@ -1288,8 +1288,8 @@ void spapr_free_hpt(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
close_htab_fd(spapr);
}
-static void spapr_reallocate_hpt(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int shift,
- Error **errp)
+void spapr_reallocate_hpt(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int shift,
+ Error **errp)
{
long rc;
@@ -1337,9 +1337,17 @@ static void spapr_reallocate_hpt(sPAPRMachineState
*spapr, int shift,
void spapr_setup_hpt_and_vrma(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
{
- spapr_reallocate_hpt(spapr,
- spapr_hpt_shift_for_ramsize(MACHINE(spapr)->maxram_size),
- &error_fatal);
+ int hpt_shift;
+
+ if ((spapr->resize_hpt == SPAPR_RESIZE_HPT_DISABLED)
+ || (spapr->cas_reboot
+ && !spapr_ovec_test(spapr->ov5_cas, OV5_HPT_RESIZE))) {
+ hpt_shift = spapr_hpt_shift_for_ramsize(MACHINE(spapr)->maxram_size);
+ } else {
+ hpt_shift = spapr_hpt_shift_for_ramsize(MACHINE(spapr)->ram_size);
+ }
+ spapr_reallocate_hpt(spapr, hpt_shift, &error_fatal);
+
if (spapr->vrma_adjust) {
spapr->rma_size = kvmppc_rma_size(spapr_node0_size(),
spapr->htab_shift);
@@ -2254,6 +2262,11 @@ static void ppc_spapr_init(MachineState *machine)
spapr_ovec_set(spapr->ov5, OV5_HP_EVT);
}
+ /* advertise support for HPT resizing */
+ if (spapr->resize_hpt != SPAPR_RESIZE_HPT_DISABLED) {
+ spapr_ovec_set(spapr->ov5, OV5_HPT_RESIZE);
+ }
+
/* init CPUs */
if (machine->cpu_model == NULL) {
machine->cpu_model = kvm_enabled() ? "host" : smc->tcg_default_cpu;
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
index f69ce4f60c..436f5e2b22 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
@@ -1473,6 +1473,35 @@ static target_ulong
h_client_architecture_support(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
guest_radix = spapr_ovec_test(ov5_guest, OV5_MMU_RADIX_300);
spapr_ovec_clear(ov5_guest, OV5_MMU_RADIX_300);
+ /*
+ * HPT resizing is a bit of a special case, because when enabled
+ * we assume an HPT guest will support it until it says it
+ * doesn't, instead of assuming it won't support it until it says
+ * it does. Strictly speaking that approach could break for
+ * guests which don't make a CAS call, but those are so old we
+ * don't care about them. Without that assumption we'd have to
+ * make at least a temporary allocation of an HPT sized for max
+ * memory, which could be impossibly difficult under KVM HV if
+ * maxram is large.
+ */
+ if (!guest_radix && !spapr_ovec_test(ov5_guest, OV5_HPT_RESIZE)) {
+ int maxshift =
spapr_hpt_shift_for_ramsize(MACHINE(spapr)->maxram_size);
+
+ if (spapr->resize_hpt == SPAPR_RESIZE_HPT_REQUIRED) {
+ error_report(
+ "h_client_architecture_support: Guest doesn't support HPT
resizing, but resize-hpt=required");
+ exit(1);
+ }
+
+ if (spapr->htab_shift < maxshift) {
+ /* Guest doesn't know about HPT resizing, so we
+ * pre-emptively resize for the maximum permitted RAM. At
+ * the point this is called, nothing should have been
+ * entered into the existing HPT */
+ spapr_reallocate_hpt(spapr, maxshift, &error_fatal);
+ }
+ }
+
/* NOTE: there are actually a number of ov5 bits where input from the
* guest is always zero, and the platform/QEMU enables them independently
* of guest input. To model these properly we'd want some sort of mask,
diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
index 3dd62d81f6..2a303a705c 100644
--- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
+++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
@@ -660,6 +660,8 @@ void
spapr_hotplug_req_remove_by_count_indexed(sPAPRDRConnectorType drc_type,
uint32_t count, uint32_t index);
void spapr_cpu_parse_features(sPAPRMachineState *spapr);
int spapr_hpt_shift_for_ramsize(uint64_t ramsize);
+void spapr_reallocate_hpt(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int shift,
+ Error **errp);
/* CPU and LMB DRC release callbacks. */
void spapr_core_release(DeviceState *dev);
diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h
index 0b464e22e7..9edfa5ff75 100644
--- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h
+++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ typedef struct sPAPROptionVector sPAPROptionVector;
#define OV5_DRCONF_MEMORY OV_BIT(2, 2)
#define OV5_FORM1_AFFINITY OV_BIT(5, 0)
#define OV5_HP_EVT OV_BIT(6, 5)
+#define OV5_HPT_RESIZE OV_BIT(6, 7)
#define OV5_XIVE_EXPLOIT OV_BIT(23, 7)
/* ISA 3.00 MMU features: */
--
2.13.3
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 09/21] spapr: Cleanups relating to DRC awaiting_release field, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 09/21] spapr: Cleanups relating to DRC awaiting_release field, David Gibson, 2017/07/17
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 14/21] ppc/pnv: Remove unused XICSState reference, David Gibson, 2017/07/17
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 13/21] spapr: fix potential memory leak in spapr_core_plug(), David Gibson, 2017/07/17
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 17/21] pseries: Enable HPT resizing for 2.10, David Gibson, 2017/07/17
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 03/21] spapr: Minor cleanups to events handling, David Gibson, 2017/07/17
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 19/21] pseries: Allow HPT resizing with KVM, David Gibson, 2017/07/17
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 12/21] spapr: Implement DR-indicator for physical DRCs only, David Gibson, 2017/07/17
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 10/21] spapr: Consolidate DRC state variables, David Gibson, 2017/07/17
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 21/21] target/ppc: fix CPU hotplug when radix is enabled (TCG), David Gibson, 2017/07/17
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 11/21] spapr: Remove sPAPRConfigureConnectorState sub-structure, David Gibson, 2017/07/17
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 18/21] pseries: Use smaller default hash page tables when guest can resize,
David Gibson <=
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 15/21] pseries: Stubs for HPT resizing, David Gibson, 2017/07/17
- [Qemu-devel] [PULL 16/21] pseries: Implement HPT resizing, David Gibson, 2017/07/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/21] ppc-for-2.10 queue 20170717, Peter Maydell, 2017/07/17