qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 8/8] virtio-crypto: use virtqueue_error for e


From: Gonglei (Arei)
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 8/8] virtio-crypto: use virtqueue_error for errors with queue context
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:51:53 +0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cornelia Huck [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:37 PM
> To: Ladi Prosek
> Cc: qemu-devel; Fernando Casas Schössow; Michael S. Tsirkin; Jason Wang;
> Markus Armbruster; Greg Kurz; Gonglei (Arei);
> address@hidden; Stefan Hajnoczi
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 8/8] virtio-crypto: use virtqueue_error 
> for
> errors with queue context
> 
> On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:31:59 +0200
> Ladi Prosek <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:02:37 +0200
> > > Ladi Prosek <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > >> virtqueue_error includes queue index in the error output and is preferred
> > >> for errors that pertain to a virtqueue rather than to the device as a 
> > >> whole.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Ladi Prosek <address@hidden>
> > >> ---
> > >>  hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c | 56
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> > >>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c
> > >> index 0353eb6..08e6c03 100644
> > >> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c
> > >> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto.c
> > >> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ static inline int virtio_crypto_vq2q(int queue_index)
> > >>
> > >>  static int
> > >>  virtio_crypto_cipher_session_helper(VirtIODevice *vdev,
> > >> +           VirtQueue *ctrl_vq,
> > >>             CryptoDevBackendSymSessionInfo *info,
> > >>             struct virtio_crypto_cipher_session_para *cipher_para,
> > >>             struct iovec **iov, unsigned int *out_num)
> > >> @@ -61,7 +62,7 @@ virtio_crypto_cipher_session_helper(VirtIODevice
> *vdev,
> > >>          info->cipher_key = g_malloc(info->key_len);
> > >>          s = iov_to_buf(*iov, num, 0, info->cipher_key, info->key_len);
> > >>          if (unlikely(s != info->key_len)) {
> > >> -            virtio_error(vdev, "virtio-crypto cipher key incorrect");
> > >> +            virtqueue_error(ctrl_vq, "virtio-crypto cipher key
> incorrect");
> > >
> > > As virtio-crypto devices always have one control queue, I would just
> > > use the pointer stored in the vcrypto structure. This avoids some of
> > > the cascading function signature changes.
> >
> > Will do. I wanted to be explicit to make the change more future-proof,
> > but maybe it is better to keep it simple. Thanks!
> 
> I don't see a case for multiple virtio-crypto control vqs, even in the
> future, but let's see what the virtio-crypto maintainer thinks.
> 
Yes, Cornelia is right. Pls go ahead.

Thanks,
-Gonglei




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]