qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 04/10] migration: let MigrationState be a qde


From: Peter Xu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 04/10] migration: let MigrationState be a qdev
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:11:23 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:03:21AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 04:18:56AM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> > On 2017-06-27 06:10, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > Let the old man "MigrationState" join the object family. Direct benefit
> > > is that we can start to use all the property features derived from
> > > current QDev, like: HW_COMPAT_* bits, command line setup for migration
> > > parameters (so will never need to set them up each time using HMP/QMP,
> > > this is really, really attractive for test writters), etc.
> > > 
> > > I see no reason to disallow this happen yet. So let's start from this
> > > one, to see whether it would be anything good.
> > > 
> > > Now we init the MigrationState struct statically in main() to make sure
> > > it's initialized after global properties are applied, since we'll use
> > > them during creation of the object.
> > > 
> > > No functional change at all.
> > 
> > Evidently not quite right because this breaks iotest 055.
> > 
> > Condensed test case:
> > 
> > $ ./qemu-img create -f vmdk -o subformat=streamOptimized foo.vmdk 64M
> > Formatting 'foo.vmdk', fmt=vmdk size=67108864 compat6=off
> > hwversion=undefined subformat=streamOptimized
> > $ x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -drive if=none,file=foo.vmdk
> > qemu-system-x86_64: ./migration/migration.c:114: migrate_get_current:
> > Assertion `current_migration' failed.
> > [1]    15453 abort (core dumped)  x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64
> > -drive if=none,file=foo.vmdk
> > 
> > (It just worked before this patch.)
> 
> Sorry. Will have a look.

Hello, Max,

The assertion is caused by migrate_add_blocker() called before
initialization of migration object. I'll fix it.

But even with a fix (so I can pass 055 now), I still cannot pass some
of the other tests. Errors I got:

  https://pastebin.com/ACqbXAYd

I am not familiar with iotests. Is above usual? Looks like it still
includes 3 failures, and some output mismatch.

-- 
Peter Xu



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]