qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: fix wild pointer when remove virtio


From: Jason Wang
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: fix wild pointer when remove virtio-net queues
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 14:02:57 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0



On 2017年04月26日 18:45, wangyunjian wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Wang [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 5:18 PM
To: wangyunjian <address@hidden>; address@hidden; address@hidden
Cc: caihe <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-net: fix wild pointer when remove 
virtio-net queues



On 2017年04月26日 14:45, Yunjian Wang wrote:
The tx_bh or tx_timer will free in virtio_net_del_queue() function,
when removing virtio-net queues if the guest doesn't support
multiqueue. But it might be still referenced by
virtio_net_set_status(), which needs to be set NULL. And also the
tx_waiting needs to be set zero to prevent
virtio_net_set_status() accessing tx_bh or tx_timer.

Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <address@hidden>
---
   hw/net/virtio-net.c | 3 +++
   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c index
7d091c9..98bd683 100644
--- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
+++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
@@ -1522,9 +1522,12 @@ static void virtio_net_del_queue(VirtIONet *n, int index)
       if (q->tx_timer) {
           timer_del(q->tx_timer);
           timer_free(q->tx_timer);
+        q->tx_timer = NULL;
       } else {
           qemu_bh_delete(q->tx_bh);
+        q->tx_bh = NULL;
       }
+    q->tx_waiting = 0;
       virtio_del_queue(vdev, index * 2 + 1);
   }
Thanks for the patch.

It looks to me that clearing tx_waiting is sufficient or is there any
other reason that youneed set tx_timer/tx_bh to NULL?
It's just coding habit to avoid access wild pointer, such as
used-after-free porblem, it hard to locate the code that cause the bug.

Thanks

Applied and queued for -stable.

Thanks

Thanks




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]