[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/7] Move accel, KVM, Xen, qtest files to accel/ s
From: |
Stefano Stabellini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/7] Move accel, KVM, Xen, qtest files to accel/ subdir |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:11:32 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) |
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 20.12.2016 18:43, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > This moves the KVM and Xen files to the an accel/ subdir.
> >
> > Instead of moving the *-stubs.c file to accel/ as-is, I tried to
> > move most of the stub code to libqemustub.a. This way the obj-y
> > logic for accel/ is simpler: obj-y includes accel/ only if
> > CONFIG_SOFTMMU is set.
> >
> > The Xen stubs could be moved completely to stubs/, but some of
> > the KVM stubs depend on cpu.h. So most of the kvm-stub.c code was
> > moved to stubs/kvm.c, but some of that code was kept in
> > accel/kvm-stub.c.
> >
> > About TCG:
> > ----------
> >
> > It is not obvious to me which TCG-related files could be moved to
> > accel/, so this series don't move any of them yet.
> >
> > About other CONFIG_SOFTMMU top-level files:
> > -------------------------------------------
> >
> > I would like to know what we should do with the top-level
> > CONFIG_SOFTMMU-only files that don't belong to hw/. Some
> > candidates: arch_init.c cpus.c monitor.c gdbstub.c balloon.c
> > ioport.c bootdevice.c memory.c cputlb.c memory_mapping.c dump.c.
> >
> > Maybe a sysemu/ subdir? In that case, should we still create an
> > accel/ subdir, or move xen-*, kvm-* and friends to sysemu/ too?
> >
> > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > Cc: Christoffer Dall <address@hidden>
> > Cc: Anthony Perard <address@hidden>
> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <address@hidden>
> > Cc: address@hidden
> >
> > Eduardo Habkost (7):
> > xen: Move xen-*-stub.c to stubs/
> > xen: Move xen files to accel/
> > kvm: Move some kvm-stub.c code to stubs/kvm.c
> > kvm: Include kvm-stub.o only on CONFIG_SOFTMMU
> > kvm: Move kvm*.c files to accel/
> > accel: Move accel.c to accel/
> > accel: Move qtest.c to accel/
> >
> > Makefile.objs | 2 +-
> > Makefile.target | 10 ++----
> > accel.c => accel/accel.c | 0
> > kvm-all.c => accel/kvm-common.c | 0
> > kvm-stub.c => accel/kvm-stub.c | 51 --------------------------
> > qtest.c => accel/qtest.c | 0
> > xen-common.c => accel/xen-common.c | 0
> > xen-hvm.c => accel/xen-hvm.c | 0
> > xen-mapcache.c => accel/xen-mapcache.c | 0
> > stubs/kvm.c | 65
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > xen-hvm-stub.c => stubs/xen-hvm.c | 0
> > xen-common-stub.c => stubs/xen.c | 0
> > MAINTAINERS | 4 +--
> > accel/Makefile.objs | 9 +++++
> > stubs/Makefile.objs | 2 ++
> > 15 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> > rename accel.c => accel/accel.c (100%)
> > rename kvm-all.c => accel/kvm-common.c (100%)
> > rename kvm-stub.c => accel/kvm-stub.c (71%)
> > rename qtest.c => accel/qtest.c (100%)
> > rename xen-common.c => accel/xen-common.c (100%)
> > rename xen-hvm.c => accel/xen-hvm.c (100%)
> > rename xen-mapcache.c => accel/xen-mapcache.c (100%)
> > rename xen-hvm-stub.c => stubs/xen-hvm.c (100%)
> > rename xen-common-stub.c => stubs/xen.c (100%)
> > create mode 100644 accel/Makefile.objs
>
> Now that the development tree is open again ... any chance that we could
> get this series into 2.10 ?
FYI I took Anothony Xu's patches to move the xen files under hw/xen/ and
hw/i386/xen, see the last 3 patches of
address@hidden