qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/2] reduce qemu's heap Rss size from 12252kB


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 1/2] reduce qemu's heap Rss size from 12252kB to 2752KB
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:41:30 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0


On 10/03/2017 16:14, Yang Zhong wrote:
> There are a lot of memory allocation during the qemu bootup, which are
> freed later by RCU thread,which means the heap size becomes biger and
> biger when allocation happens, but the heap may not be shrinked even
> after release happens,because some memory blocks in top of heap are still
> being used.Decreasing the sleep and removing qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread()
> lock, which make call_rcu_thread()thread response the free memory in time.
> This patch will reduce heap Rss around 10M.
> 
> This patch is from Anthony xu <address@hidden>.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <address@hidden>
> ---
>  util/rcu.c | 8 ++------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/util/rcu.c b/util/rcu.c
> index 9adc5e4..c5c373c 100644
> --- a/util/rcu.c
> +++ b/util/rcu.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
>  }
>  
>  
> -#define RCU_CALL_MIN_SIZE        30
> +#define RCU_CALL_MIN_SIZE        5
>  
>  /* Multi-producer, single-consumer queue based on urcu/static/wfqueue.h
>   * from liburcu.  Note that head is only used by the consumer.
> @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static void *call_rcu_thread(void *opaque)
>           * added before synchronize_rcu() starts.
>           */
>          while (n == 0 || (n < RCU_CALL_MIN_SIZE && ++tries <= 5)) {
> -            g_usleep(10000);
> +            g_usleep(100);
>              if (n == 0) {
>                  qemu_event_reset(&rcu_call_ready_event);
>                  n = atomic_read(&rcu_call_count);
> @@ -254,24 +254,20 @@ static void *call_rcu_thread(void *opaque)
>  
>          atomic_sub(&rcu_call_count, n);
>          synchronize_rcu();
> -        qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
>          while (n > 0) {
>              node = try_dequeue();
>              while (!node) {
> -                qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
>                  qemu_event_reset(&rcu_call_ready_event);
>                  node = try_dequeue();
>                  if (!node) {
>                      qemu_event_wait(&rcu_call_ready_event);
>                      node = try_dequeue();
>                  }
> -                qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
>              }
>  
>              n--;
>              node->func(node);
>          }
> -        qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();

This is wrong.  RCU callbacks currently need the "big QEMU lock",
because they can free arbitrary QOM objects (including MemoryRegions).

Paolo

>      }
>      abort();
>  }
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]