[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new bloc
From: |
Ketan Nilangekar |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs" |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:21:46 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1c.1.161117 |
On 2/21/17, 5:59 AM, "Stefan Hajnoczi" <address@hidden> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 03:34:57AM -0800, ashish mittal wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 12:30:31AM +0000, Ketan Nilangekar wrote:
> >> On 2/17/17, 1:42 PM, "Jeff Cody" <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 02:24:19PM -0800, ashish mittal wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I am getting the following error with checkpatch.pl
> >> >
> >> > ERROR: externs should be avoided in .c files
> >> > #78: FILE: block/vxhs.c:28:
> >> > +QemuUUID qemu_uuid __attribute__ ((weak));
> >> >
> >> > Is there any way to get around this, or does it mean that I
would have
> >> > to add a vxhs.h just for this one entry?
> >> >
> >>
> >> I remain skeptical on the use of the qemu_uuid as a way to select
the TLS
> >> cert.
> >>
> >> [ketan]
> >> Is there another identity that can be used for uniquely identifying
instances?
> >> The requirement was to enforce vdisk access to owner instances.
> >
> > The qemu_uuid weak attribute looks suspect. What is going to provide a
> > strong qemu_uuid symbol?
> >
> > Why aren't configuration parameters like the UUID coming from the QEMU
> > command-line?
> >
> > Stefan
>
> UUID will in fact come from the QEMU command line. VxHS is not doing
> anything special here. It will just use the value already available to
> qemu-kvm process.
>
> QemuUUID qemu_uuid;
> bool qemu_uuid_set;
>
> Both the above are defined in vl.c. vl.c will provide the strong
> symbol when available. There are certain binaries that do not get
> linked with vl.c (e.g. qemu-img). The weak symbol will come into
> affect for such binaries, and in this case, the default VXHS UUID will
> get picked up. I had, in a previous email, explained how we plan to
> use the default UUID. In the regular case, the VxHS controller will
> not allow access to the default UUID (non qemu-kvm) binaries, but it
> may choose to grant temporary access to specific vdisks for these
> binaries depending on the workflow.
That idea sounds like a security problem. During this time window
anyone could use the default UUID to access the data?
Just make the UUID (or TLS client certificate file) a command-line
parameter that qemu-system, qemu-img, and other tools accept (e.g.
qemu-img via the --image-opts/--object syntax).
[Ketan]
Sounds fair. Would it be ok to take this up after the driver is merged for the
upcoming QEMU release?
Stefan
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", Stefan Hajnoczi, 2017/02/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/02/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", Stefan Hajnoczi, 2017/02/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/02/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", Jeff Cody, 2017/02/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", ashish mittal, 2017/02/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/02/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", ashish mittal, 2017/02/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/02/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", ashish mittal, 2017/02/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs",
Ketan Nilangekar <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/02/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", Jeff Cody, 2017/02/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/02/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", Jeff Cody, 2017/02/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/02/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", Stefan Hajnoczi, 2017/02/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 1/2] block/vxhs.c: Add support for a new block device type called "vxhs", Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/02/20