[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue
From: |
Laszlo Ersek |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:24:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 |
On 01/24/17 12:17, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 01/24/17 11:48, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/hw/display/cirrus_vga.c b/hw/display/cirrus_vga.c
>>>> index 379910d..7ddd289 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/display/cirrus_vga.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/display/cirrus_vga.c
>>>> @@ -277,7 +277,8 @@ static bool blit_region_is_unsafe(struct
>>>> CirrusVGAState *s,
>>>> }
>>>> if (pitch < 0) {
>>>> int64_t min = addr
>>>> - + ((int64_t)s->cirrus_blt_height-1) * pitch;
>>>> + + ((int64_t)s->cirrus_blt_height-1) * pitch
>>>> + - s->cirrus_blt_width;
>>>> int32_t max = addr
>>>> + s->cirrus_blt_width;
>>>> if (min < 0 || max > s->vga.vram_size) {
>>>>
>>>
>>> I believe this is incorrect. In this case (AFAIR), "addr" points to the
>>> left-most pixel (= lowest address) of the bottom line (= highest
>>> address).
>>
>> If I read the code correctly it is backwards *both* x and y axis, so
>> addr is the right-most pixel of the bottom line.
>
> What is "max" then? If "addr" is the right-most pixel of the bottom
> line, then "max" has the highest address just past the rectangle, and
> then adding anything non-negative to it makes no sense.
sorry, over-editing caused a bug. I meant
If "addr" is the right-most pixel of the bottom line (or just one
past that), then *it* has the highest address, and then adding
anything non-negative to it (i.e., how we end up with "max") makes no
sense.
I should have started with the diagram, not with the text.
Thanks
Laszlo
>
> Adding a negative value to it (i.e., if s->cirrus_blt_width were
> negative) might make sense, for getting the leftmost pixel on the bottom
> line, but then that "max" value shouldn't be used for the final boundary
> check (against RAM size).
>
> ... Really as I remember it from the downstream review, the pitch is
> negative (bottom-up), but the horizontal direction remains left to right.
>
> 0-----------------------------------------------------------------> x
> |
> | addr + (height - 1) * pitch, pitch < 0, height > 0
> | |
> | v
> | *--------------------* <-- addr + (height - 1) * pitch + width
> | | |
> | | |
> | | |
> | | |
> | | |
> | | |
> | *--------------------*
> | ^ ^
> | | |
> | addr max = addr + width, width > 0
> |
> v
> y
>
>
> The rightmost column represented here is exclusive, the rest is inclusive.
>
> Thanks
> Laszlo
>
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue, Li Qiang, 2017/01/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue, no-reply, 2017/01/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue, Laszlo Ersek, 2017/01/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue, Gerd Hoffmann, 2017/01/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue, Laszlo Ersek, 2017/01/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue,
Laszlo Ersek <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue, Gerd Hoffmann, 2017/01/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue, Wolfgang Bumiller, 2017/01/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue, Laszlo Ersek, 2017/01/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue, Li Qiang, 2017/01/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue, Laszlo Ersek, 2017/01/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue, Gerd Hoffmann, 2017/01/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue, Gerd Hoffmann, 2017/01/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cirrus: fix oob access issue, Laszlo Ersek, 2017/01/25