qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 16/20] intel_iommu: do replay when contex


From: Jason Wang
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 16/20] intel_iommu: do replay when context invalidate
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:36:17 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1



On 2017年01月20日 21:08, Peter Xu wrote:
Before this one we only invalidate context cache when we receive context
entry invalidations. However it's possible that the invalidation also
contains a domain switch (only if cache-mode is enabled for vIOMMU). In
that case we need to notify all the registered components about the new
mapping.

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
---
  hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 10 ++++++++++
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
index f9c5142..4b08b4d 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
@@ -1146,6 +1146,16 @@ static void 
vtd_context_device_invalidate(IntelIOMMUState *s,
                  trace_vtd_inv_desc_cc_device(bus_n, VTD_PCI_SLOT(devfn_it),
                                               VTD_PCI_FUNC(devfn_it));
                  vtd_as->context_cache_entry.context_cache_gen = 0;
+                /*
+                 * So a device is moving out of (or moving into) a
+                 * domain, a replay() suites here to notify all the
+                 * IOMMU_NOTIFIER_MAP registers about this change.
+                 * This won't bring bad even if we have no such
+                 * notifier registered - the IOMMU notification
+                 * framework will skip MAP notifications if that
+                 * happened.
+                 */
+                memory_region_iommu_replay_all(&vtd_as->iommu);

DSI and GLOBAL questions come back again or no need to care about them :) ?

Thanks

              }
          }
      }




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]