qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 02/10] intel_iommu: name vtd address space wi


From: Peter Xu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 02/10] intel_iommu: name vtd address space with devfn
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 17:22:09 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 04:19:31PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2016年12月16日 11:53, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> >
> >On 2016年12月16日 10:53, Peter Xu wrote:
> >>On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 03:09:47PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>>To avoid duplicated name and ease debugging.
> >>>
> >>>Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> >>>Cc: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> >>>Cc: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> >>>Cc: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
> >>>Acked-by: Peter Xu <address@hidden>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <address@hidden>
> >>>---
> >>>  hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 4 +++-
> >>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>>diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> >>>index 1655a65..5272c30 100644
> >>>--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> >>>+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> >>>@@ -2323,6 +2323,7 @@ VTDAddressSpace *vtd_find_add_as(IntelIOMMUState
> >>>*s, PCIBus *bus, int devfn)
> >>>      uintptr_t key = (uintptr_t)bus;
> >>>      VTDBus *vtd_bus = g_hash_table_lookup(s->vtd_as_by_busptr, &key);
> >>>      VTDAddressSpace *vtd_dev_as;
> >>>+    char name[128];
> >>>        if (!vtd_bus) {
> >>>          /* No corresponding free() */
> >>>@@ -2336,6 +2337,7 @@ VTDAddressSpace *vtd_find_add_as(IntelIOMMUState
> >>>*s, PCIBus *bus, int devfn)
> >>>      vtd_dev_as = vtd_bus->dev_as[devfn];
> >>>        if (!vtd_dev_as) {
> >>>+        snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "intel_iommu_devfn_%d", devfn);
> >>Better with bus number as well? ;)
> >>
> >>Like: "%02x:%02x.%x" for (bus, dev, fn).
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>
> >>-- peterx
> >
> >Yes, will do it in next version.
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> 
> Actually, I choose not to bother since bus and fn number needs more codes to
> get.

Should this work?

    snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "intel_iommu_%02x:%02x.%x",
             pci_bus_num(bus), VTD_PCI_SLOT(devfn),
             VTD_PCI_FUNC(devfn));

Anyway, I am okay as well to keep it as it is. :)

-- peterx



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]