Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] Stubs cleanup

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 22/12/2016 18:30, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 December 2016 at 15:59, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
>> This moves out of libqemustub.a those functions which can be handled
>> simply by $(call lnot), like we already do for pci-stub.c or kvm-stub.c.
>> libqemustub.a keep the more complex cases where a small part of the
>> executables we build needs an implementation of a small subset of an API.
> 
> So why is doing it this way round better? (I don't have a strong
> opinion here, but you don't really give a rationale for this change.)

I don't really have a strong opinion here either, hence the RFC.
However, one advantage is that it keeps things visible to the right
maintainer.

Paolo