qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 07/10] memhp: move GPE handler_E03 into


From: Marcel Apfelbaum
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9 07/10] memhp: move GPE handler_E03 into build_memory_hotplug_aml()
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:45:16 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1

On 12/21/2016 03:39 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:31:45 +0200
Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden> wrote:

On 12/06/2016 01:32 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
From this patch all the memory hotplug related AML
bits are consolidated in one place within DSTD.
Follow up patches will utilize that to simplify
memory hotplug related C/AML code.


I didn't quite understand what you mean...
me neither :/, it's quite useless commit message,
how about this one instead:

--
build hotplug event handler method body in generic
hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c and make hw/i386/acpi-build.c
only provide target specific full name of the event
handler.
That removes hardcoded MEMORY_HOTPLUG_HANDLER_PATH and
allows to do target specific memory hotplug AML placement
and wiring it with a target specific hotplug event handler
(it's GPE for i386 and would be GPIO for ARM).


Works for me.

PS:
similar approach has been used with CPU hotplug as part of commit:
(d2238cb6 acpi: cpuhp: implement hot-add parts of CPU hotplug interface)
--




Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
---
 include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h |  6 +++---
 hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c         | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 hw/i386/acpi-build.c             |  7 ++-----
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h b/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
index 6dc48d2..37e2706 100644
--- a/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
+++ b/include/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.h
@@ -49,9 +49,9 @@ void acpi_memory_ospm_status(MemHotplugState *mem_st, 
ACPIOSTInfoList ***list);

 #define MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEVICE        "MHPD"
 #define MEMORY_SLOT_SCAN_METHOD      "MSCN"
-#define MEMORY_HOTPLUG_HANDLER_PATH "\\_SB.PCI0." \
-     MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEVICE "." MEMORY_SLOT_SCAN_METHOD

 void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table, uint32_t nr_mem,
-                              uint16_t io_base, uint16_t io_len);
+                              uint16_t io_base, uint16_t io_len,
+                              const char *res_root,
+                              const char *event_handler_method);
 #endif
diff --git a/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c b/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
index 18b95f2..49e856f 100644
--- a/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -308,18 +308,19 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_memory_hotplug = {
 };

 void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table, uint32_t nr_mem,
-                              uint16_t io_base, uint16_t io_len)
+                              uint16_t io_base, uint16_t io_len,
+                              const char *res_root,
+                              const char *event_handler_method)
 {
     int i;
     Aml *ifctx;
     Aml *method;
-    Aml *pci_scope;
     Aml *sb_scope;
     Aml *mem_ctrl_dev;
+    char *scan_path;
+    char *mhp_res_path = g_strdup_printf("%s." MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEVICE, 
res_root);

-    /* scope for memory hotplug controller device node */
-    pci_scope = aml_scope("_SB.PCI0");
-    mem_ctrl_dev = aml_device(MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEVICE);
+    mem_ctrl_dev = aml_device("%s", mhp_res_path);


Will mem_ctrl_dev's name will have an extra "." suffix now?
nope it will be declared with target specific full path rather
than within separately created static scope:

Right, I mismatched the printf arguments..


-    Scope (_SB.PCI0)
+    Device (\_SB.PCI0.MHPD) // concat (res_root, ".", MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEVICE)
     {
-        Device (MHPD)
...
and event handler would change like this:

+    Method (\_GPE._E03, 0, NotSerialized)  // _Exx: Edge-Triggered GPE
+    {
+        \_SB.PCI0.MHPD.MSCN ()
+    }
+
     Scope (_GPE)
     {
         Name (_HID, "ACPI0006" /* GPE Block Device */)  // _HID: Hardware ID
-        Method (_E03, 0, NotSerialized)  // _Exx: Edge-Triggered GPE
-        {
-            \_SB.PCI0.MHPD.MSCN ()
-        }



OK



     {
         Aml *crs;
         Aml *field;
@@ -610,47 +611,50 @@ void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table, uint32_t nr_mem,
         }
         aml_append(mem_ctrl_dev, method);
     }
-    aml_append(pci_scope, mem_ctrl_dev);
-    aml_append(table, pci_scope);
+    aml_append(table, mem_ctrl_dev);

     sb_scope = aml_scope("_SB");
     /* build memory devices */
     for (i = 0; i < nr_mem; i++) {
-        #define BASEPATH "\\_SB.PCI0." MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEVICE "."
         Aml *dev;
-        const char *s;
+        char *s;

         dev = aml_device("MP%02X", i);
         aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_string("0x%02X", i)));
         aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_eisaid("PNP0C80")));

         method = aml_method("_CRS", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
-        s = BASEPATH MEMORY_SLOT_CRS_METHOD;
+        s = g_strdup_printf("%s.%s", mhp_res_path, MEMORY_SLOT_CRS_METHOD);

Same question here, do we get ".." in the path? Maybe is OK?
nope, it dynamic equivalent of original static 'BASEPATH 
MEMORY_SLOT_CRS_METHOD;'
where BASEPATH is replaced with
  concat(mhp_res_path, ".", MEMORY_SLOT_CRS_METHOD)

this 'for' loop changes are temporary and are part of transition
to dynamic mem hotplug AML placement. See patch 10/10 which simplifies
names within this 'for' loop and reduces AML size as result by placing
called methods within the same scope/container.


Thanks for the explanations.

Thanks,
Marcel

         aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_call1(s, aml_name("_UID"))));
+        g_free(s);
         aml_append(dev, method);

         method = aml_method("_STA", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
-        s = BASEPATH MEMORY_SLOT_STATUS_METHOD;
+        s = g_strdup_printf("%s.%s", mhp_res_path, MEMORY_SLOT_STATUS_METHOD);
         aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_call1(s, aml_name("_UID"))));
+        g_free(s);
         aml_append(dev, method);

         method = aml_method("_PXM", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
-        s = BASEPATH MEMORY_SLOT_PROXIMITY_METHOD;
+        s = g_strdup_printf("%s.%s", mhp_res_path,
+                            MEMORY_SLOT_PROXIMITY_METHOD);
         aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_call1(s, aml_name("_UID"))));
+        g_free(s);
         aml_append(dev, method);

         method = aml_method("_OST", 3, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
-        s = BASEPATH MEMORY_SLOT_OST_METHOD;
-
+        s = g_strdup_printf("%s.%s", mhp_res_path, MEMORY_SLOT_OST_METHOD);
         aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_call4(
             s, aml_name("_UID"), aml_arg(0), aml_arg(1), aml_arg(2)
         )));
+        g_free(s);
         aml_append(dev, method);

         method = aml_method("_EJ0", 1, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
-        s = BASEPATH MEMORY_SLOT_EJECT_METHOD;
+        s = g_strdup_printf("%s.%s", mhp_res_path, MEMORY_SLOT_EJECT_METHOD);
         aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_call2(
                    s, aml_name("_UID"), aml_arg(0))));
+        g_free(s);
         aml_append(dev, method);

         aml_append(sb_scope, dev);
@@ -669,4 +673,12 @@ void build_memory_hotplug_aml(Aml *table, uint32_t nr_mem,
     }
     aml_append(sb_scope, method);
     aml_append(table, sb_scope);
+
+    method = aml_method(event_handler_method, 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
+    scan_path = g_strdup_printf("%s.%s", mhp_res_path, 
MEMORY_SLOT_SCAN_METHOD);
+    aml_append(method, aml_call0(scan_path));
+    g_free(scan_path);
+    aml_append(table, method);
+
+    g_free(mhp_res_path);
 }
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index 690e9a0..b7f4682 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -1926,7 +1926,8 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
                        "\\_SB.PCI0", "\\_GPE._E02");
     }
     build_memory_hotplug_aml(dsdt, nr_mem, pm->mem_hp_io_base,
-                             pm->mem_hp_io_len);
+                             pm->mem_hp_io_len,
+                             "\\_SB.PCI0", "\\_GPE._E03");

     scope =  aml_scope("_GPE");
     {
@@ -1941,10 +1942,6 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
             aml_append(scope, method);
         }

-        method = aml_method("_E03", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
-        aml_append(method, aml_call0(MEMORY_HOTPLUG_HANDLER_PATH));
-        aml_append(scope, method);
-
         if (pcms->acpi_nvdimm_state.is_enabled) {
             method = aml_method("_E04", 0, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
             aml_append(method, aml_notify(aml_name("\\_SB.NVDR"),





Reviewed-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>

Thanks,
Marcel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]