[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mttcg: Handle EXCP_ATOMIC exception
From: |
Alex Bennée |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mttcg: Handle EXCP_ATOMIC exception |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Nov 2016 16:22:52 +0000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 25.1.50.14 |
Pranith Kumar <address@hidden> writes:
> The patch enables handling atomic code in the guest. This should be
> preferably done in cpu_handle_exception(), but the current assumptions
> regarding when we can execute atomic sections cause a deadlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <address@hidden>
> ---
> cpus.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
> index 8f98060..c4ba7d8 100644
> --- a/cpus.c
> +++ b/cpus.c
> @@ -1315,6 +1315,9 @@ static void *qemu_tcg_rr_cpu_thread_fn(void *arg)
> if (r == EXCP_DEBUG) {
> cpu_handle_guest_debug(cpu);
> break;
> + } else if (r == EXCP_ATOMIC) {
> + cpu_exec_step_atomic(cpu);
> + break;
Hmm don't we need to unlock the iothread here as well? I suspect you
never see a deadlock because the rr thread can't by definition race with
itself but the locking practice should be the same for both cases.
> }
> } else if (cpu->stop) {
> if (cpu->unplug) {
> @@ -1385,6 +1388,10 @@ static void *qemu_tcg_cpu_thread_fn(void *arg)
> */
> g_assert(cpu->halted);
> break;
> + case EXCP_ATOMIC:
> + qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
> + cpu_exec_step_atomic(cpu);
> + qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
> default:
> /* Ignore everything else? */
> break;
--
Alex Bennée