[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cpus: make qemu_mutex_iothread_locked() underst
From: |
Alex Bennée |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cpus: make qemu_mutex_iothread_locked() understand co-routines |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Nov 2016 16:21:36 +0000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 25.1.50.13 |
Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> writes:
> On 21/10/2016 13:54, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> There is a slight wart when checking for the state of the BQL when using
>> GThread base co-routines (which we keep for ThreadSanitizer runs). While
>> the main-loop holds the BQL it is suspended until the co-routine
>> completes however the co-routines run in a separate thread so checking
>> the TLS variable could be wrong.
>>
>> We fix this by expanding the check to include qemu_in_coroutine() for
>> GThread based builds. As it is not used for production builds I'm not
>> overly worried about any performance impact which should be negligible
>> anyway.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
>
> This is wrong unfortunately. It is possible to run coroutines outside
> the BQL (e.g. with -device virtio-blk,iothread=foo).
>
> Do you know exactly why TSAN has no love for coroutines?
The current production stuff is due to missing support for new stacks
with setcontext. However I have built the latest tsan support library
and that seems happy without the gthread co-routines.
Currently I'm dealing with glib's racy gthread support however.
>
> Paolo
>
>> ---
>> configure | 3 +++
>> cpus.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/configure b/configure
>> index 91a14c1..97b89fb 100755
>> --- a/configure
>> +++ b/configure
>> @@ -5461,6 +5461,9 @@ if test "$rbd" = "yes" ; then
>> fi
>>
>> echo "CONFIG_COROUTINE_BACKEND=$coroutine" >> $config_host_mak
>> +if test "$coroutine" = "gthread" ; then
>> + echo "CONFIG_COROUTINE_GTHREAD=1" >> $config_host_mak
>> +fi
>> if test "$coroutine_pool" = "yes" ; then
>> echo "CONFIG_COROUTINE_POOL=1" >> $config_host_mak
>> else
>> diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
>> index 0c18a9f..a3e189a 100644
>> --- a/cpus.c
>> +++ b/cpus.c
>> @@ -49,6 +49,10 @@
>> #include "hw/nmi.h"
>> #include "sysemu/replay.h"
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COROUTINE_GTHREAD
>> +#include "qemu/coroutine.h"
>> +#endif
>> +
>> #ifndef _WIN32
>> #include "qemu/compatfd.h"
>> #endif
>> @@ -1422,9 +1426,18 @@ bool qemu_in_vcpu_thread(void)
>>
>> static __thread bool iothread_locked = false;
>>
>> +/*
>> + * There is a slight wart when using gthread based co-routines. Here
>> + * the BQL is held by the main-thread which is suspended until the
>> + * co-routines complete.
>> + */
>> bool qemu_mutex_iothread_locked(void)
>> {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COROUTINE_GTHREAD
>> + return iothread_locked || qemu_in_coroutine();
>> +#else
>> return iothread_locked;
>> +#endif
>> }
>>
>> void qemu_mutex_lock_iothread(void)
>>
--
Alex Bennée