Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/35] cmpxchg-based emulation of atomics

[Alex Bennée]

Emilio G. Cota <address@hidden> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:17:35 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Emilio G. Cota <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 14:40:26 -0500, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> >> Sixth time is the charm, right?  This time I'm certain that it
>> >> compiles with centos6, and contains the previously missing update
>> >> from Emilio to atomic_add-bench.
>> >
>> > For patches 03-16 (including the elusive patch 06 for which I reviewed 
>> > 1bfe0cdf8
>> > from your atomic-4 branch on github):
>> >
>> >   Reviewed-by: Emilio G. Cota <address@hidden>
>> >
>> > I just tested the patchset by running concurrencykit's ck_pr regression 
>> > test (which
>> > tests lock'ed ops) for [guest-on-host bits, all x86] 64-on-64, 32-on-32 and
>> > 64-on-32. I ran it with TCG debugging enabled. It passes all tests.
>>
>> How odd, did you not see the double temp free for target-arm/translate.c?
>
> My tests were x86-only, for both guest and host:
>> > tests lock'ed ops) for [guest-on-host bits, all x86] 64-on-64, 32-on-32 and
>                                                 ^^^^^^^
> Sorry for not being clearer.

My mistake, I assumed the x86 was all referring to the host ;-)

> I have not tested the ARM bits. I just tested aarch64 and it works, though.
>
> I put the scripts online so that others can easily generate natively the ck_pr
> tests. If you have an architecture I don't have access to (e.g. ARM, Alpha),
> please send me the resulting tarball (the ck_pr.sh script takes care of 
> everything)
> and I'll upload it with the others:
>
>   http://braap.org/qemu/ck/

I built this with your script on an debian:armhf image (powered by qemu
;-)

ck_pr-armv7l.tar.bz2
Description: ck built for armhf

>
> Thanks,
>
>               Emilio


--
Alex Bennée