|
From: | Richard Henderson |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/9] target-ppc: improve lxvw4x implementation |
Date: | Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:48:54 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 |
On 09/28/2016 08:41 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
Without patch: ============== [tcg_test]$ time ../qemu/ppc64le-linux-user/qemu-ppc64le -cpu POWER9 le_lxvw4x >/dev/null real 0m2.812s user 0m2.792s sys 0m0.020s [tcg_test]$ With patch: =========== [tcg_test]$ time ../qemu/ppc64le-linux-user/qemu-ppc64le -cpu POWER9 le_lxvw4x >/dev/null real 0m2.801s user 0m2.783s sys 0m0.018s [tcg_test]$ Not much perceivable difference, is there a better way to benchmark?
There should be more of a difference for softmmu, since the tlb lookup for the memory is more expensive.
r~
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |