Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] coroutine: add qemu_coroutine_entered() function

[Kevin Wolf]

Am 27.09.2016 um 18:55 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> 
> 
> On 27/09/2016 18:29, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 27/09/2016 16:06, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >>> See the doc comments for a description of this new coroutine API.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
> >>> ---
> >>>  include/qemu/coroutine.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> >>>  util/qemu-coroutine.c    |  5 +++++
> >>>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/include/qemu/coroutine.h b/include/qemu/coroutine.h
> >>> index 29a2078..e6a60d5 100644
> >>> --- a/include/qemu/coroutine.h
> >>> +++ b/include/qemu/coroutine.h
> >>> @@ -92,6 +92,19 @@ Coroutine *coroutine_fn qemu_coroutine_self(void);
> >>>   */
> >>>  bool qemu_in_coroutine(void);
> >>>
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * Return true if the coroutine is currently entered
> >>> + *
> >>> + * A coroutine is "entered" if it has not yielded from the current
> >>> + * qemu_coroutine_enter() call used to run it.  This does not mean that 
> >>> the
> >>> + * coroutine is currently executing code since it may have transferred 
> >>> control
> >>> + * to another coroutine using qemu_coroutine_enter().
> >>> + *
> >>> + * When several coroutines enter each other there may be no way to know 
> >>> which
> >>> + * ones have already been entered.  In such situations this function can 
> >>> be
> >>> + * used to avoid recursively entering coroutines.
> >>> + */
> >>> +bool qemu_coroutine_entered(Coroutine *co);
> >>
> >> Perhaps qemu_coroutine_running is a better name?
> > 
> > I find "running" confusing since the coroutine may not actually be
> > currently executing (as mentioned in the doc comment).
> 
> Ok, makes sense.  Another possibility is qemu_coroutine_on_stack, but
> I'm not sure it's better...

Maybe qemu_coroutine_active()?

Kevin