[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] iscsi: Fix divide-by-zero regression on raw
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] iscsi: Fix divide-by-zero regression on raw SG devices |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Sep 2016 18:42:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 |
On 07/09/2016 23:27, Eric Blake wrote:
> When qemu uses iscsi devices in sg mode, iscsilun->block_size
> is left at 0. Prior to commits cf081fca and similar, when
> block limits were tracked in sectors, this did not matter:
> various block limits were just left at 0. But when we started
> scaling by block size, this caused SIGFPE.
>
> Then, in a later patch, commit a5b8dd2c added an assertion to
> bdrv_open_common() that request_alignment is always non-zero;
> which was not true for SG mode. Rather than relax that assertion,
> we can just provide a sane value (we don't know of any SG device
> with a block size smaller than qemu's default sizing of 512 bytes).
>
> One possible solution for SG mode is to just blindly skip ALL
> of iscsi_refresh_limits(), since we already short circuit so
> many other things in sg mode. But this patch takes a slightly
> more conservative approach, and merely guarantees that scaling
> will succeed, while still using multiples of the original size
> where possible. Resulting limits may still be zero in SG mode
> (that is, we mostly only fix block_size used as a denominator
> or which affect assertions, not all uses).
>
> Reported-by: Holger Schranz <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden
>
> ---
> v2: avoid second assertion failure
> ---
> block/iscsi.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/iscsi.c b/block/iscsi.c
> index 95ce9e1..c01e955 100644
> --- a/block/iscsi.c
> +++ b/block/iscsi.c
> @@ -1813,19 +1813,23 @@ static void iscsi_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState
> *bs, Error **errp)
>
> IscsiLun *iscsilun = bs->opaque;
> uint64_t max_xfer_len = iscsilun->use_16_for_rw ? 0xffffffff : 0xffff;
> + unsigned int block_size = MIN_NON_ZERO(BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE,
> + iscsilun->block_size);
>
> - bs->bl.request_alignment = iscsilun->block_size;
> + assert(iscsilun->block_size >= BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE || bs->sg);
> +
> + bs->bl.request_alignment = block_size;
>
> if (iscsilun->bl.max_xfer_len) {
> max_xfer_len = MIN(max_xfer_len, iscsilun->bl.max_xfer_len);
> }
>
> - if (max_xfer_len * iscsilun->block_size < INT_MAX) {
> + if (max_xfer_len * block_size < INT_MAX) {
> bs->bl.max_transfer = max_xfer_len * iscsilun->block_size;
> }
>
> if (iscsilun->lbp.lbpu) {
> - if (iscsilun->bl.max_unmap < 0xffffffff / iscsilun->block_size) {
> + if (iscsilun->bl.max_unmap < 0xffffffff / block_size) {
> bs->bl.max_pdiscard =
> iscsilun->bl.max_unmap * iscsilun->block_size;
> }
> @@ -1835,7 +1839,7 @@ static void iscsi_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs,
> Error **errp)
> bs->bl.pdiscard_alignment = iscsilun->block_size;
> }
>
> - if (iscsilun->bl.max_ws_len < 0xffffffff / iscsilun->block_size) {
> + if (iscsilun->bl.max_ws_len < 0xffffffff / block_size) {
> bs->bl.max_pwrite_zeroes =
> iscsilun->bl.max_ws_len * iscsilun->block_size;
> }
> @@ -1846,7 +1850,7 @@ static void iscsi_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs,
> Error **errp)
> bs->bl.pwrite_zeroes_alignment = iscsilun->block_size;
> }
> if (iscsilun->bl.opt_xfer_len &&
> - iscsilun->bl.opt_xfer_len < INT_MAX / iscsilun->block_size) {
> + iscsilun->bl.opt_xfer_len < INT_MAX / block_size) {
> bs->bl.opt_transfer = pow2floor(iscsilun->bl.opt_xfer_len *
> iscsilun->block_size);
> }
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo