qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 17/18] trace: pass trace-events to tracetool


From: Lluís Vilanova
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 17/18] trace: pass trace-events to tracetool as a positional param
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 19:46:41 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Daniel P Berrange writes:

> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 08:18:51PM +0200, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
>> Daniel P Berrange writes:
>> 
>> > Instead of reading the contents of 'trace-events' from stdin,
>> > accept the filename as a positional parameter. This also
>> > allows for reading from multiple files, though this facility
>> > is not used at this time.
>> 
>> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <address@hidden>
>> > ---
>> >  Makefile.target      |  6 +++---
>> >  scripts/tracetool.py |  5 ++++-
>> >  trace/Makefile.objs  | 18 +++++++++---------
>> >  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>> 
>> > diff --git a/scripts/tracetool.py b/scripts/tracetool.py
>> > index 6accbbf..f66e767 100755
>> > --- a/scripts/tracetool.py
>> > +++ b/scripts/tracetool.py
>> > @@ -129,7 +129,10 @@ def main(args):
>> >          if probe_prefix is None:
>> >              probe_prefix = ".".join(["qemu", target_type, target_name])
>> 
>> > -    events = tracetool.read_events(sys.stdin)
>> > +    if len(args) != 1:
>> > +        error_opt("missing trace-events filepath")
>> > +    with open(args[0], "r") as fh:
>> > +        events = tracetool.read_events(fh)
>> 
>> I'm not sure that's the proper way to check for a positional argument in 
>> getopt
>> (iff it accepts optional args mingled with positional ones).

> 'args' comes from the return value of getopt.getopt(sys.argv)
> which is documented as:

>   "The return value consists of two elements: the first is a
>    list of (option, value) pairs; the second is the list of
>    program arguments left after the option list was stripped
>    (this is a trailing slice of args"

Oh, I'm sorry. I should've looked more closely into the code.


Cheers,
  Lluis



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]