qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v1 0/8] Merge qcrypto 2016/09/19


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v1 0/8] Merge qcrypto 2016/09/19
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:31:27 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17)

On Mon, 09/19 14:01, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 September 2016 at 13:47, Daniel P. Berrange <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 05:33:57AM -0700, address@hidden wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Your series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
> >> more information:
> >>
> >> Type: series
> >> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v1 0/8] Merge qcrypto 2016/09/19
> >> Message-id: address@hidden
> >>
> >> === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
> >> #!/bin/bash
> >>
> >> BASE=base
> >> n=1
> >> total=$(git log --oneline $BASE.. | wc -l)
> >> failed=0
> >>
> >> # Useful git options
> >> git config --local diff.renamelimit 0
> >> git config --local diff.renames True
> >>
> >> commits="$(git log --format=%H --reverse $BASE..)"
> >> for c in $commits; do
> >>     echo "Checking PATCH $n/$total: $(git show --no-patch --format=%s 
> >> $c)..."
> >>     if ! git show $c --format=email | ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback 
> >> -; then
> >>         failed=1
> >>         echo
> >>     fi
> >>     n=$((n+1))
> >> done
> >>
> >> exit $failed
> >> === TEST SCRIPT END ===
> >>
> >> Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384
> >> Switched to a new branch 'test'
> >> bdd8574 crypto: add trace points for TLS cert verification
> >> a5218f2 crypto: support more hash algorithms for pbkdf
> >> 4483f4e crypto: increase default pbkdf2 time for luks to 2 seconds
> >> c75443a crypto: remove bogus /= 2 for pbkdf iterations
> >> 61e0f1a crypto: use correct derived key size when timing pbkdf
> >> 616fc7b crypto: clear out buffer after timing pbkdf algorithm
> >> d4a7ad1 crypto: make PBKDF iterations configurable for LUKS format
> >> f56a5e3 crypto: use uint64_t for pbkdf iteration count parameters
> >>
> >> === OUTPUT BEGIN ===
> >> Checking PATCH 1/8: crypto: use uint64_t for pbkdf iteration count 
> >> parameters...
> >> Checking PATCH 2/8: crypto: make PBKDF iterations configurable for LUKS 
> >> format...
> >> Checking PATCH 3/8: crypto: clear out buffer after timing pbkdf 
> >> algorithm...
> >> Checking PATCH 4/8: crypto: use correct derived key size when timing 
> >> pbkdf...
> >> Checking PATCH 5/8: crypto: remove bogus /= 2 for pbkdf iterations...
> >> Checking PATCH 6/8: crypto: increase default pbkdf2 time for luks to 2 
> >> seconds...
> >> Checking PATCH 7/8: crypto: support more hash algorithms for pbkdf...
> >> ERROR: if this code is redundant consider removing it
> >> #222: FILE: tests/test-crypto-pbkdf.c:332:
> >> +#if 0
> >>
> >> total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 194 lines checked
> >
> > Peter, FWIW, I know about this style check error and I'm intentionally
> > ignoring it as I consider it a false positive. IMHO we should probably
> > downgrade that style check to a WARNING, not an ERROR. The message itself
> > is indicating that maintainers have discretion to ignore it and thus it
> > shouldn't be an error.
> 
> Well, I don't in general look at patchew complaints on pull
> requests (we should probably make it stop sending them) on
> the basis that the maintainer should have already done that
> before accepting the patches.

Please keep in mind if a series was based on a maintainer tree or another
pending series, it would fail to apply it thus skip the testing and stay quiet;
pull requests on the contrary can be applied to master reliably. Therefore, I'm
not sure about stoping that.

Fam



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]