qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PULL 44/64] target-ppc: implement branch-less divw[o][.]


From: David Gibson
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 44/64] target-ppc: implement branch-less divw[o][.]
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 20:29:23 +1000

From: Nikunj A Dadhania <address@hidden>

While implementing modulo instructions figured out that the
implementation uses many branches. Change the logic to achieve the
branch-less code. Undefined value is set to dividend in case of invalid
input.

Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
---
 target-ppc/translate.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target-ppc/translate.c b/target-ppc/translate.c
index 379d3d4..f69836d 100644
--- a/target-ppc/translate.c
+++ b/target-ppc/translate.c
@@ -1097,41 +1097,39 @@ static void gen_addpcis(DisasContext *ctx)
 static inline void gen_op_arith_divw(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv ret, TCGv arg1,
                                      TCGv arg2, int sign, int compute_ov)
 {
-    TCGLabel *l1 = gen_new_label();
-    TCGLabel *l2 = gen_new_label();
-    TCGv_i32 t0 = tcg_temp_local_new_i32();
-    TCGv_i32 t1 = tcg_temp_local_new_i32();
+    TCGv_i32 t0 = tcg_temp_new_i32();
+    TCGv_i32 t1 = tcg_temp_new_i32();
+    TCGv_i32 t2 = tcg_temp_new_i32();
+    TCGv_i32 t3 = tcg_temp_new_i32();
 
     tcg_gen_trunc_tl_i32(t0, arg1);
     tcg_gen_trunc_tl_i32(t1, arg2);
-    tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, t1, 0, l1);
-    if (sign) {
-        TCGLabel *l3 = gen_new_label();
-        tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_NE, t1, -1, l3);
-        tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, t0, INT32_MIN, l1);
-        gen_set_label(l3);
-        tcg_gen_div_i32(t0, t0, t1);
-    } else {
-        tcg_gen_divu_i32(t0, t0, t1);
-    }
-    if (compute_ov) {
-        tcg_gen_movi_tl(cpu_ov, 0);
-    }
-    tcg_gen_br(l2);
-    gen_set_label(l1);
     if (sign) {
-        tcg_gen_sari_i32(t0, t0, 31);
+        tcg_gen_setcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, t2, t0, INT_MIN);
+        tcg_gen_setcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, t3, t1, -1);
+        tcg_gen_and_i32(t2, t2, t3);
+        tcg_gen_setcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, t3, t1, 0);
+        tcg_gen_or_i32(t2, t2, t3);
+        tcg_gen_movi_i32(t3, 0);
+        tcg_gen_movcond_i32(TCG_COND_NE, t1, t2, t3, t2, t1);
+        tcg_gen_div_i32(t3, t0, t1);
+        tcg_gen_extu_i32_tl(ret, t3);
     } else {
-        tcg_gen_movi_i32(t0, 0);
+        tcg_gen_setcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, t2, t1, 0);
+        tcg_gen_movi_i32(t3, 0);
+        tcg_gen_movcond_i32(TCG_COND_NE, t1, t2, t3, t2, t1);
+        tcg_gen_divu_i32(t3, t0, t1);
+        tcg_gen_extu_i32_tl(ret, t3);
     }
     if (compute_ov) {
-        tcg_gen_movi_tl(cpu_ov, 1);
-        tcg_gen_movi_tl(cpu_so, 1);
+        tcg_gen_extu_i32_tl(cpu_ov, t2);
+        tcg_gen_or_tl(cpu_so, cpu_so, cpu_ov);
     }
-    gen_set_label(l2);
-    tcg_gen_extu_i32_tl(ret, t0);
     tcg_temp_free_i32(t0);
     tcg_temp_free_i32(t1);
+    tcg_temp_free_i32(t2);
+    tcg_temp_free_i32(t3);
+
     if (unlikely(Rc(ctx->opcode) != 0))
         gen_set_Rc0(ctx, ret);
 }
-- 
2.7.4




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]