qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] ADB improvements


From: Programmingkid
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] ADB improvements
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 15:21:16 -0400

On Aug 23, 2016, at 8:19 AM, David Gibson wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 07:37:16PM -0700, address@hidden wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Your series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
>> more information:
>> 
>> Message-id: address@hidden
>> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/4] ADB improvements
>> Type: series
>> 
>> === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
>> #!/bin/bash
>> 
>> BASE=base
>> n=1
>> total=$(git log --oneline $BASE.. | wc -l)
>> failed=0
>> 
>> # Useful git options
>> git config --local diff.renamelimit 0
>> git config --local diff.renames True
>> 
>> commits="$(git log --format=%H --reverse $BASE..)"
>> for c in $commits; do
>>    echo "Checking PATCH $n/$total: $(git show --no-patch --format=%s $c)..."
>>    if ! git show $c --format=email | ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback -; 
>> then
>>        failed=1
>>        echo
>>    fi
>>    n=$((n+1))
>> done
>> 
>> exit $failed
>> === TEST SCRIPT END ===
>> 
>> Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384
>> From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu
>> * [new tag]         patchew/address@hidden -> patchew/address@hidden
>> Switched to a new branch 'test'
>> 8e862cb adb.c: prevent NO_KEY value from going to guest
>> 649cccc adb.c: correct several key assignments
>> f4950b2 adb.c: add support for QKeyCode
>> db1d3d7 adb-keys.h: initial commit
>> 
>> === OUTPUT BEGIN ===
>> Checking PATCH 1/4: adb-keys.h: initial commit...
>> ERROR: line over 90 characters
>> #30: FILE: include/hw/input/adb-keys.h:14:
>> + *  Additional information: 
>> http://www.archive.org/stream/apple-guide-macintosh-family-hardware/Apple_Guide_to_the_Macintosh_Family_Hardware_2e#page/n345/mode/2up
> 
> This error can be ignored - the line is only long because of the
> stupidly long URL, which should not be broken.

Ok. I'm glad I didn't listen to that patch checker program. 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]