qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Help: Does Qemu support virtio-pci for net-device and d


From: Andrea Bolognani
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Help: Does Qemu support virtio-pci for net-device and disk device?
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:41:33 +0200

On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 18:13 +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 08:08:11PM +0800, Kevin Zhao wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >      Now I'm investigating net device hot plug and disk hotplug for
> > AArch64. For virtio , the default address is virtio-mmio. After Libvirt
> > 1.3.5, user can explicitly specify the address-type to pci and so libvirt
> > will pass the virtio-pci parameters to the Qemu.
> >      Both my host and guest OS is Debian8, and Qemu version is 2.6.0.
> > Libvirt version is 1.3.5.
> >      For net-device, I change the address-type to pci, and libvirt pass the
> > command below:
> >      -device
> > virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,mac=52:54:00:0d:25:25,bus=pci.2,addr=0x1
>
> >      After booting, the eth0 device disappear(eth0 occur when the address
> > is virtio-mmio),
> > but I can find another net-device enp2s1, also it can't work for dhcp:
> > Running lspci: 02:01.0 Ethernet controller: Red Hat, Inc Virtio network
> > device
> > I'm not sure whether it worked.
>
> >      For disk device,* when I change the address-type to pci, the whole
> > qemu command is :*
> > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/409553/,  but the VM can not boot
> > successfully. Does Qemu not support device disk of virtio-pci in AArch64
> > just as it in X86_64?
> >      Thanks~Since I am not very familiar with Qemu, really looking forward
> > to your response.
>
> > Best Regards,
> > Kevin Zhao
> 
> libvirt 1.3.5 is a bit old. Later versions no longer unconditionally add
> the i82801b11 bridge, which was necessary to use PCI devices with the PCIe
> host bridge mach-virt has. IMO, libvirt and qemu still have a long way to
> go in order to configure a base/standard mach-virt PCIe machine.

Debian 8, the guest OS Kevin is trying to boot, is even older,
and in particular it doesn't have any virtio-pci support.

By the way, the same issue was raised on the libvirt list as
well

  https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2016-August/msg00854.html

and there's some more information there.

> 1) If we want to support both PCIe devices and PCI, then things are messy.
>    Currently we propose dropping PCI support. mach-virt pretty much
>    exclusively uses virtio, which can be set to PCIe mode (virtio-1.0)
> 2) root complex ports, switches (upstream/downstream ports) are currently
>    based on Intel parts. Marcel is thinking about creating generic models.

Huge +1 from me! Way to go, Marcel! :)

> 3) libvirt needs to learn how to plug everything together, in proper PCIe
>    fashion, leaving holes for hotplug.

Work on this front is ongoing on the libvirt front as we speak.

> 4) Probably more... I forget all the different issues we discovered when
>    we started playing with this a few months ago.
> 
> The good news is that x86 folk want all the same things for the q35 model.
> mach-virt enthusiasts like us get to ride along pretty much for free.
> 
> So, using virtio-pci with mach-virt and libvirt isn't possible right now,
> not without manual changes to the XML. It might be nice to document how to
> manually convert a guest, so developers who want to use virtio-pci don't
> have to abandon libvirt. I'd have to look into that, or ask one of our
> libvirt friends to help. Certainly the instructions would be for latest
> libvirt though.

Things are very much in flux, though, so I'm not entirely sure
putting out any sort of official document would be a good idea
right now. We'll definitely help eg. through the mailing lists
and similar channels, but committing any configuration to a
more static media seems premature.

> Finally, FWIW, with a guest kernel of 4.6.4-301.fc24.aarch64. The
> following qemu command line works for me.
> (notice the use of PCIe), and my network interface gets labeled enp0s1.
> 
> $QEMU -machine virt-2.6,accel=kvm -cpu host \
>  -m 1024 -smp 1 -nographic \
>  -bios /usr/share/AAVMF/AAVMF_CODE.fd \
>  -device ioh3420,bus=pcie.0,id=pcie.1,port=1,chassis=1 \
>  -device ioh3420,bus=pcie.0,id=pcie.2,port=2,chassis=2 \
>  -device 
>virtio-scsi-pci,disable-modern=off,disable-legacy=on,bus=pcie.1,addr=00.0,id=scsi0
> \
>  -drive 
>file=/home/drjones/.local/libvirt/images/fedora.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=none,id=drive-scsi0-0-0-0
> \
>  -device 
>scsi-hd,bus=scsi0.0,channel=0,scsi-id=0,lun=0,drive=drive-scsi0-0-0-0,id=scsi0-0-0-0,bootindex=1
> \
>  -netdev user,id=hostnet0 \
>  -device 
>virtio-net-pci,disable-modern=off,disable-legacy=on,bus=pcie.2,addr=00.0,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0
> 
> I prefer always using virtio-scsi for the disk, but a similar command
> line can be used for a virtio-blk-pci disk.

Does the same command line work if you don't specify any of
the disable-* options?

I'm asking because I tried running a Fedora 24 guest through
libvirt, which doesn't support those options yet, and I get

  virtio_blk virtio2: virtio: device uses modern interface but
                              does not have VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1
  virtio_blk: probe of virtio2 failed with error -22

Isn't the default for 2.6 disable-modern=off,
disable-legacy=off? Or was that 2.7? I tried both anyway ;)

-- 
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]