[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64
From: |
Laurent Vivier |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64 |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:28:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 |
On 22/07/2016 08:43, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 06:47:56PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> As userfaultfd syscall is available on powerpc, migration
>> postcopy can be used.
>>
>> This patch adds the support needed to test this on powerpc,
>> instead of using a bootsector to run code to modify memory,
>> we use a FORTH script in "boot-command" property.
>>
>> As spapr machine doesn't support "-prom-env" argument
>> (the nvram is initialized by SLOF and not by QEMU),
>> "boot-command" is provided to SLOF via a file mapped nvram
>> (with "-drive file=...,if=pflash")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> v2: move FORTH script directly in sprintf()
>> use openbios_firmware_abi.h
>> remove useless "default" case
>>
>> tests/Makefile.include | 1 +
>> tests/postcopy-test.c | 116
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> There's a mostly cosmetic problem with this. If you run make check
> for a ppc64 target on an x86 machine, you get:
>
> GTESTER check-qtest-ppc64
> "kvm" accelerator not found.
> "kvm" accelerator not found.
I think this is because of "-machine accel=kvm:tcg", it tries to use kvm
and fall back to tcg.
accel.c:
80 void configure_accelerator(MachineState *ms)
81 {
...
100 acc = accel_find(buf);
101 if (!acc) {
102 fprintf(stderr, "\"%s\" accelerator not found.\n", buf);
103 continue;
104 }
We can remove the "-machine" argument to use the default instead (tcg or
kvm).
Laurent
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64, Laurent Vivier, 2016/07/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2016/07/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64, Thomas Huth, 2016/07/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64, David Gibson, 2016/07/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64,
Laurent Vivier <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64, David Gibson, 2016/07/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64, Laurent Vivier, 2016/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64, Thomas Huth, 2016/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64, Laurent Vivier, 2016/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64, Laurent Vivier, 2016/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2016/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64, Laurent Vivier, 2016/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64, David Gibson, 2016/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64, Thomas Huth, 2016/07/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] test: port postcopy test to ppc64, Laurent Vivier, 2016/07/26