[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/10] util/qht: Document memory ordering assumptions

[Paolo Bonzini]

It is naturally expected that some memory ordering should be provided
around qht_insert() and qht_lookup(). Document these assumptions in the
header file and put some comments in the source to denote how that
memory ordering requirements are fulfilled.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
[Sergey Fedorov: commit title and message provided;
comment on qht_remove() elided]
Signed-off-by: Sergey Fedorov <address@hidden>
Message-Id: <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
---
 include/qemu/qht.h | 5 +++++
 util/qht.c         | 7 ++++++-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/qemu/qht.h b/include/qemu/qht.h
index 70bfc68..311139b 100644
--- a/include/qemu/qht.h
+++ b/include/qemu/qht.h
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ void qht_destroy(struct qht *ht);
  * Attempting to insert a NULL @p is a bug.
  * Inserting the same pointer @p with different @hash values is a bug.
  *
+ * In case of successful operation, smp_wmb() is implied before the pointer is
+ * inserted into the hash table.
+ *
  * Returns true on sucess.
  * Returns false if the @address@hidden pair already exists in the hash table.
  */
@@ -83,6 +86,8 @@ bool qht_insert(struct qht *ht, void *p, uint32_t hash);
  *
  * Needs to be called under an RCU read-critical section.
  *
+ * smp_read_barrier_depends() is implied before the call to @func.
+ *
  * The user-provided @func compares pointers in QHT against @userp.
  * If the function returns true, a match has been found.
  *
diff --git a/util/qht.c b/util/qht.c
index 40d6e21..28ce289 100644
--- a/util/qht.c
+++ b/util/qht.c
@@ -445,7 +445,11 @@ void *qht_do_lookup(struct qht_bucket *head, 
qht_lookup_func_t func,
     do {
         for (i = 0; i < QHT_BUCKET_ENTRIES; i++) {
             if (b->hashes[i] == hash) {
-                void *p = atomic_read(&b->pointers[i]);
+                /* The pointer is dereferenced before seqlock_read_retry,
+                 * so (unlike qht_insert__locked) we need to use
+                 * atomic_rcu_read here.
+                 */
+                void *p = atomic_rcu_read(&b->pointers[i]);
 
                 if (likely(p) && likely(func(p, userp))) {
                     return p;
@@ -535,6 +539,7 @@ static bool qht_insert__locked(struct qht *ht, struct 
qht_map *map,
         atomic_rcu_set(&prev->next, b);
     }
     b->hashes[i] = hash;
+    /* smp_wmb() implicit in seqlock_write_begin.  */
     atomic_set(&b->pointers[i], p);
     seqlock_write_end(&head->sequence);
     return true;
-- 
2.7.4