qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] rbd: reload ceph config for block device


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] rbd: reload ceph config for block device
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 15:19:38 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0

On 07/14/2016 02:53 PM, Vaibhav Bhembre wrote:
> Thanks Eric!

meta-comment - your mailer's default quoting behavior makes it very hard
to read your replies.  Observe:

> 
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> On 07/14/2016 01:32 PM, Vaibhav Bhembre wrote:
>>> This patch adds ability to reload ceph configuration for an attached RBD
>>> block device. This is necessary for the cases where rebooting a VM and/or
>>> detaching-reattaching a RBD drive is not an easy option.
>>
>> Probably worth including address@hidden if you resend this. I've
>> added them in cc now, per the output of:
>>  scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f block/rbd
>>
>>>
>>> The reload mechanism relies on the bdrv_reopen_* calls to provide a
>> transactional
>>> guarantee (using 2PC) for pulling in new configuration parameters. In
>> the _prepare

Your mailer wrapped your lines but used inconsistent prefix when doing
so, which makes attribution of the lines difficult (some start with
'>>>', which traces to you, some start with '>>' which traces to me) (of
course, this is after my mailer has added yet another round of >
prefixing, but at least I know my mailer [Thunderbird] has sane quoting
behavior for the most part).

...
>>> +# Since: 2.7
>>
>> v1 was posted June 17, before soft freeze on June 28, so this may still
>> make hard freeze if someone picks it up before hard freeze on July 19.
>> But we're getting close.
>>
>> ​Hoping so! ​
> 

Here, both my text ("But we're getting close") and your text ("Hoping
so!") are prefixed with the same '>>' prefix, which makes it sound like
I wrote your reply.


>> We may want to rebase this on top of Kevin's series that adds
>> qmp_get_root_bs()
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-07/msg03086.html
>>
>> ​This is exactly what I need. Should I wait for other reviews before
> making this change or should I push it right-away?

and here, half your paragraph is attributed to me (prefix of '>>') while
only the second half is attributed to you (prefix of '>').

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]