qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 19/19] cpu-exec: remove tb_lock from the hot-pa


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3 19/19] cpu-exec: remove tb_lock from the hot-path
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:47:58 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 25.0.95.6

Sergey Fedorov <address@hidden> writes:

> On 03/06/16 23:40, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Lock contention in the hot path of moving between existing patched
>> TranslationBlocks is the main drag on MTTCG performance. This patch
>> pushes the tb_lock() usage down to the two places that really need it:
>>
>>   - code generation (tb_gen_code)
>>   - jump patching (tb_add_jump)
>>
>> The rest of the code doesn't really need to hold a lock as it is either
>> using per-CPU structures or designed to be used in concurrent read
>> situations (qht_lookup).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
>>
>> ---
>> v3
>>   - fix merge conflicts with Sergey's patch
>> ---
>>  cpu-exec.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
>> index b017643..4af0b52 100644
>> --- a/cpu-exec.c
>> +++ b/cpu-exec.c
>> @@ -298,41 +298,38 @@ static TranslationBlock *tb_find_slow(CPUState *cpu,
>>       * Pairs with smp_wmb() in tb_phys_invalidate(). */
>>      smp_rmb();
>>      tb = tb_find_physical(cpu, pc, cs_base, flags);
>> -    if (tb) {
>> -        goto found;
>> -    }
>> +    if (!tb) {
>>
>> -    /* mmap_lock is needed by tb_gen_code, and mmap_lock must be
>> -     * taken outside tb_lock.  Since we're momentarily dropping
>> -     * tb_lock, there's a chance that our desired tb has been
>> -     * translated.
>> -     */
>> -    tb_unlock();
>> -    mmap_lock();
>> -    tb_lock();
>> -    tb = tb_find_physical(cpu, pc, cs_base, flags);
>> -    if (tb) {
>> -        mmap_unlock();
>> -        goto found;
>> -    }
>> +        /* mmap_lock is needed by tb_gen_code, and mmap_lock must be
>> +         * taken outside tb_lock.
>> +         */
>> +        mmap_lock();
>> +        tb_lock();
>>
>> -    /* if no translated code available, then translate it now */
>> -    tb = tb_gen_code(cpu, pc, cs_base, flags, 0);
>> +        /* There's a chance that our desired tb has been translated while
>> +         * taking the locks so we check again inside the lock.
>> +         */
>> +        tb = tb_find_physical(cpu, pc, cs_base, flags);
>> +        if (!tb) {
>> +            /* if no translated code available, then translate it now */
>> +            tb = tb_gen_code(cpu, pc, cs_base, flags, 0);
>> +        }
>>
>> -    mmap_unlock();
>> +        tb_unlock();
>> +        mmap_unlock();
>> +    }
>>
>> -found:
>> -    /* we add the TB in the virtual pc hash table */
>> +    /* We add the TB in the virtual pc hash table for the fast lookup */
>>      cpu->tb_jmp_cache[tb_jmp_cache_hash_func(pc)] = tb;
>
> Hmm, seems like I forgot to convert this into atomic_set() in the
> previous patch...

OK, can you fix that in your quick fixes series?

>
>>      return tb;
>>  }
>>
>>  static inline TranslationBlock *tb_find_fast(CPUState *cpu,
>> -                                             TranslationBlock **last_tb,
>> +                                             TranslationBlock **ltbp,
>
> I'm not sure if it is more readable...

I'll revert. I was trying to keep line lengths short :-/

>
>>                                               int tb_exit)
>>  {
>>      CPUArchState *env = (CPUArchState *)cpu->env_ptr;
>> -    TranslationBlock *tb;
>> +    TranslationBlock *tb, *last_tb;
>>      target_ulong cs_base, pc;
>>      uint32_t flags;
>>
>> @@ -340,7 +337,6 @@ static inline TranslationBlock *tb_find_fast(CPUState 
>> *cpu,
>>         always be the same before a given translated block
>>         is executed. */
>>      cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(env, &pc, &cs_base, &flags);
>> -    tb_lock();
>>      tb = atomic_read(&cpu->tb_jmp_cache[tb_jmp_cache_hash_func(pc)]);
>>      if (unlikely(!tb || tb->pc != pc || tb->cs_base != cs_base ||
>>                   tb->flags != flags)) {
>> @@ -350,7 +346,7 @@ static inline TranslationBlock *tb_find_fast(CPUState 
>> *cpu,
>>          /* Ensure that no TB jump will be modified as the
>>           * translation buffer has been flushed.
>>           */
>> -        *last_tb = NULL;
>> +        *ltbp = NULL;
>>          cpu->tb_flushed = false;
>>      }
>>  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>> @@ -359,14 +355,19 @@ static inline TranslationBlock *tb_find_fast(CPUState 
>> *cpu,
>>       * spanning two pages because the mapping for the second page can 
>> change.
>>       */
>>      if (tb->page_addr[1] != -1) {
>> -        *last_tb = NULL;
>> +        *ltbp = NULL;
>>      }
>>  #endif
>> +
>>      /* See if we can patch the calling TB. */
>> -    if (*last_tb && !qemu_loglevel_mask(CPU_LOG_TB_NOCHAIN)) {
>> -        tb_add_jump(*last_tb, tb_exit, tb);
>> +    last_tb = *ltbp;
>> +    if (!qemu_loglevel_mask(CPU_LOG_TB_NOCHAIN) &&
>> +        last_tb &&
>> +        !last_tb->jmp_list_next[tb_exit]) {
>
> If we're going to check this outside of tb_lock we have to do this with
> atomic_{read,set}(). However, I think it is rare case to race on
> tb_add_jump() so probably it is okay to do the check under tb_lock.

It's checking for NULL, it gets re-checked in tb_add_jump while under
lock so I the setting race should be OK I think.

>
>> +        tb_lock();
>> +        tb_add_jump(last_tb, tb_exit, tb);
>> +        tb_unlock();
>>      }
>> -    tb_unlock();
>>      return tb;
>>  }
>>
>
> Kind regards,
> Sergey


--
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]