[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:28:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 |
On 17/06/2016 17:19, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > So, what happens if the guest play tricks in bits 40-45 when QEMU
> > > sets the limit to 40 but we are running in a 46-bit host? Is it
> > > really a problem? I assumed it would be safe.
> >
> > The guest expects a "reserved bit set" page fault, but doesn't get one.
>
> Wait, are you talking about migration only, or are you really
> talking about running current QEMU (hardcoded to 40) on a 46-bit
> host? I'm not talking about migration, above.
I'm talking about both. :(
> We really can't emulate a 40-bit machine in a 46-bit host? I
> didn't expect that.
Unfortunately that's the case. :(
Paolo
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set, Laszlo Ersek, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set, Laszlo Ersek, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set, Marcel Apfelbaum, 2016/06/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set, Igor Mammedov, 2016/06/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set, Marcel Apfelbaum, 2016/06/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set, Paolo Bonzini, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set, Eduardo Habkost, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set, Paolo Bonzini, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set, Eduardo Habkost, 2016/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set, Eduardo Habkost, 2016/06/17
- [Qemu-devel] Default for phys-addr-bits? (was Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set), Eduardo Habkost, 2016/06/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Default for phys-addr-bits? (was Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set), Paolo Bonzini, 2016/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Default for phys-addr-bits? (was Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set), Andrea Arcangeli, 2016/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Default for phys-addr-bits? (was Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set), Paolo Bonzini, 2016/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Default for phys-addr-bits? (was Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set), Andrea Arcangeli, 2016/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Default for phys-addr-bits? (was Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set), Paolo Bonzini, 2016/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Default for phys-addr-bits? (was Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set), Andrea Arcangeli, 2016/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Default for phys-addr-bits? (was Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set), Michael S. Tsirkin, 2016/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Default for phys-addr-bits? (was Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86: Allow physical address bits to be set), Andrea Arcangeli, 2016/06/22