Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 16/22] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement gicv3_cpuif_update()

[Shannon Zhao]

On 2016/5/26 22:55, Peter Maydell wrote:
> +void gicv3_cpuif_update(GICv3CPUState *cs)
> +{
> +    /* Tell the CPU about its highest priority pending interrupt */
> +    int irqlevel = 0;
> +    int fiqlevel = 0;
> +    ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs->cpu);
> +    CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
> +
> +    trace_gicv3_cpuif_update(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), cs->hppi.irq,
> +                             cs->hppi.grp, cs->hppi.prio);
> +
> +    if (cs->hppi.grp == GICV3_G1 && !arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3)) {
> +        /* If a Security-enabled GIC sends a G1S interrupt to a
> +         * Security-disabled CPU, we must treat it as if it were G0.
> +         */
> +        cs->hppi.grp = GICV3_G0;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (icc_hppi_can_preempt(cs)) {
> +        /* We have an interrupt: should we signal it as IRQ or FIQ?
> +         * This is described in the GICv3 spec section 4.6.2.
> +         */
> +        bool isfiq;
> +
> +        switch (cs->hppi.grp) {
> +        case GICV3_G0:
> +            isfiq = true;
> +            break;
> +        case GICV3_G1:
> +            isfiq = (!arm_is_secure(env) ||
> +                     (arm_current_el(env) == 3 && arm_el_is_aa64(env, 3)));
> +            break;
> +        case GICV3_G1NS:
> +            isfiq = arm_is_secure(env);
> +            break;
> +        default:
> +            g_assert_not_reached();
> +        }
> +
> +        if (isfiq) {
> +            fiqlevel = 1;
> +        } else {
> +            irqlevel = 1;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    trace_gicv3_cpuif_set_irqs(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), fiqlevel, irqlevel);
> +
> +    qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_fiq, fiqlevel);
> +    qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_irq, irqlevel);
Does it need to set both fiq and irq for one interrupt? I think it
should be called differently based on the value of isfiq.

Thanks,
-- 
Shannon