qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] VFIO Type1 IOMMU: Add support for me


From: Neo Jia
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] VFIO Type1 IOMMU: Add support for mediated devices
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 00:56:47 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:40:19PM +0800, Dong Jia wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2016 01:28:17 +0530
> Kirti Wankhede <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Pin a set of guest PFNs and return their associated host PFNs for API
> > + * supported domain only.
> > + * @vaddr [in]: array of guest PFNs
> > + * @npage [in]: count of array elements
> > + * @prot [in] : protection flags
> > + * @pfn_base[out] : array of host PFNs
> > + */
> > +long vfio_pin_pages(void *iommu_data, dma_addr_t *vaddr, long npage,
> > +              int prot, dma_addr_t *pfn_base)
> > +{
> > +   struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
> > +   struct vfio_domain *domain = NULL;
> > +   int i = 0, ret = 0;
> > +   long retpage;
> > +   unsigned long remote_vaddr = 0;
> > +   dma_addr_t *pfn = pfn_base;
> > +   struct vfio_dma *dma;
> > +
> > +   if (!iommu || !vaddr || !pfn_base)
> > +           return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +   mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> > +
> > +   if (!iommu->mediated_domain) {
> > +           ret = -EINVAL;
> > +           goto pin_done;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   domain = iommu->mediated_domain;
> > +
> > +   for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
> > +           struct vfio_pfn *p, *lpfn;
> > +           unsigned long tpfn;
> > +           dma_addr_t iova;
> > +           long pg_cnt = 1;
> > +
> > +           iova = vaddr[i] << PAGE_SHIFT;
> Dear Kirti:
> 
> Got one question for the vaddr-iova conversion here.
> Is this a common rule that can be applied to all architectures?
> AFAIK, this is wrong for the s390 case. Or I must miss something...

I need more details about the "wrong" part. 
IIUC, you are thinking about the guest iommu case?

Thanks,
Neo

> 
> If the answer to the above question is 'no', should we introduce a new
> argument to pass in the iovas? Say 'dma_addr_t *iova'.
> 
> > +
> > +           dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, iova, 0 /*  size */);
> > +           if (!dma) {
> > +                   ret = -EINVAL;
> > +                   goto pin_done;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           remote_vaddr = dma->vaddr + iova - dma->iova;
> > +
> > +           retpage = vfio_pin_pages_internal(domain, remote_vaddr,
> > +                                             pg_cnt, prot, &tpfn);
> > +           if (retpage <= 0) {
> > +                   WARN_ON(!retpage);
> > +                   ret = (int)retpage;
> > +                   goto pin_done;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           pfn[i] = tpfn;
> > +
> > +           /* search if pfn exist */
> > +           p = vfio_find_pfn(domain, tpfn);
> > +           if (p) {
> > +                   atomic_inc(&p->ref_count);
> > +                   continue;
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           /* add to pfn_list */
> > +           lpfn = kzalloc(sizeof(*lpfn), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +           if (!lpfn) {
> > +                   ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +                   goto pin_done;
> > +           }
> > +           lpfn->vaddr = remote_vaddr;
> > +           lpfn->iova = iova;
> > +           lpfn->pfn = pfn[i];
> > +           lpfn->npage = 1;
> > +           lpfn->prot = prot;
> > +           atomic_inc(&lpfn->ref_count);
> > +           vfio_link_pfn(domain, lpfn);
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   ret = i;
> > +
> > +pin_done:
> > +   mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> > +   return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfio_pin_pages);
> 
> 
> --------
> Dong Jia
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]