[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] QOM'ify hw/char devices
From: |
xiaoqiang zhao |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] QOM'ify hw/char devices |
Date: |
Thu, 5 May 2016 22:04:58 +0800 |
> 在 2016年5月5日,20:51,Peter Maydell <address@hidden> 写道:
>
>> On 5 May 2016 at 11:38, 赵小强 <address@hidden> wrote:
>> At 2016-03-29 15:47:19, "xiaoqiang zhao" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> This patch set trys to QOM'ify hw/char files, see commit messages
>>> for more details
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> * rename TYPE_SCLP_LM_CONSOLE to TYPE_SCLPLM_CONSOLE which is suggested by
>>> Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
>>> * rebase on the current master
>>>
>>> xiaoqiang zhao (6):
>>> hw/char: QOM'ify escc.c
>>> hw/char: QOM'ify etraxfs_ser.c
>>> hw/char: QOM'ify lm32_juart.c
>>> hw/char: QOM'ify lm32_uart.c
>>> hw/char: QOM'ify sclpconsole-lm.c
>>> hw/char: QOM'ify sclpconsole.c
>>>
>>> hw/char/escc.c | 12 +++++-------
>>> hw/char/etraxfs_ser.c | 11 +++++------
>>> hw/char/lm32_juart.c | 9 +++------
>>> hw/char/lm32_uart.c | 12 +++++-------
>>> hw/char/sclpconsole-lm.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>>> hw/char/sclpconsole.c | 12 ++++++++----
>>> 6 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.1.4
>>
>> ping ???
>
> I think you will have better luck if you rearrange all these
> QOM patches so that you provide them as one series per board
> or per target architecture, not one per type of device.
> There is no single person with responsibility for "all of
> hw/char" so structuring your cleanup patchsets like this will
> tend to result in the people who might care about the devices
> not looking at them. (Also you can concentrate on the devices
> which are actively maintained, like ARM ones, x86 ones, MIPS
> and SPARC ones, rather than the oddballs semi-orphaned ones
> like lm32, CRIS, etc.)
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
Thanks peter, Sounds reasonable!