qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 03/14] nand: Switch to byte-based block acces


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 03/14] nand: Switch to byte-based block access
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 15:09:48 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0

On 05/02/2016 09:35 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 29.04.2016 um 22:08 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> Sector-based blk_write() should die; switch to byte-based
>> blk_pwrite() instead.  Likewise for blk_read().
>>
>> This file is doing some complex computations to map various
>> flash page sizes (256, 512, and 2048) atop generic uses of
>> 512-byte sector operations.  Perhaps someone will want to tidy
>> up the file for fewer gymnastics in managing addresses and
>> offsets, and less wasteful visits of 256-byte pages, but it
>> was out of scope for this series, where I just went with the
>> mechanical conversion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/block/nand.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/block/nand.c b/hw/block/nand.c
>> index 29c6596..2703ff4 100644
>> --- a/hw/block/nand.c

>>      } else {
>>          off = PAGE_START(s->addr) + (s->addr & PAGE_MASK) + s->offset;
>>          sector = off >> 9;
>>          soff = off & 0x1ff;
>> -        if (blk_read(s->blk, sector, iobuf, PAGE_SECTORS + 2) < 0) {
>> +        if (blk_pread(s->blk, sector << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS, iobuf,
>> +                     (PAGE_SECTORS + 2) << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS) < 0) {

Botched indentation here, too.

>>              printf("%s: read error in sector %" PRIu64 "\n", __func__, 
>> sector);
>>              return;
>>          }
>>
>>          mem_and(iobuf + soff, s->io, s->iolen);
>>
>> -        if (blk_write(s->blk, sector, iobuf, PAGE_SECTORS + 2) < 0) {
>> +        if (blk_write(s->blk, sector << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS, iobuf,
>> +                      (PAGE_SECTORS + 2) << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS, 0) < 0) {
> 
> You forgot to actually change which function is called here.

I _did_ warn that some of my patches were not compile tested (wonder why
I forgot to warn on this one, when I did warn on 4/14).  Of course,
patch 14/14 would have caused a compile error if I had been compiling
this. So, what exactly do I need to start compiling these files, and
ensure I'm not doing dead code edits?

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]